基于风险熵的农产品安全定量评价研究

doi:10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.200406

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives

Safety monitoring data for agricultural products are currently limited as most tested indicators of the monitored samples are recorded as “undetected”, presenting a major research obstacle as researchers must still attempt to extract sufficient information. To acquire reference information for decision making and accurately quantify risks, researchers of agricultural product safety evaluation protocols need effective methods to combine the heterogeneous and sparse monitoring data from multiple monitoring projects.

Methods

Risk management is crucial to the safety of agricultural products. Focusing on the requirements of safety risk management of agricultural products, a product category and limited quantity-based strategy of data fusion was proposed to calculate the risk entropy of the “product + index” combination. Subsequently, using the theory and method of comprehensive evaluation, a macroscopic quantitative evaluation of agricultural products based on risk entropy was conducted.

Results

According to a case analysis of the safety of pesticide residues in vegetables, risk entropy can effectively extract risk information in the fused data of risk monitoring and be used in quantitative analysis. Moreover, the risk-entropy-based safety evaluation can provide complete information about risk distribution, as well as the division of risk threshold and risk ranking. It was further found that the risk entropy can accurately identify potential risk, thus effectively avoiding overestimated or underestimated risks in qualitative evaluation.

Conclusions

The findings of this study indicate that the proposed risk-entropy-based data fusion and quantitative evaluation are technically feasible. This quantitative evaluation method has been shown to improve the performance of qualitative evaluation in risk identification and description. In conclusion, the method increases the abundance of accurate references for safety risk management of agricultural products, thus promoting the progress of agricultural product safety risk management.

Key words: data fusion, risk entropy, quantitative evaluation, agricultural product safety, risk management, food safety, food security

CLC Number:

F322

Zhijun Chen, Yan Liu, Yongzhong Qian. Quantitative Evaluation of Agricultural Product Safety Based on Risk Entropy[J].Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2020, 2(4): 47-54.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

References 17

1	庞国芳. 中国市售水果蔬菜农药残留报告2012-2015[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
	Pang G F. Report on Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables Sold in Chinese Market[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
2	陈志军. 基于监测大数据的蔬菜中农药残留安全性评价[D]. 中国农业科学院, 2019.
	Chen Z J. Safety Evaluation for Pesticide Residue in vegetables Based on Monitoring Big Data[D]. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019.
3	Wang S, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Pesticide Residues in Market Foods in Shaanxi Province of China in 2010[J]. Food Chemistry. 2013, 138(2-3): 2016-25.
4	庞国芳,梁淑轩,常巧英,等.基于风险值自动计算——信息多维采集的农药残留大数据评估市售果蔬安全水平[J].中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(03): 318-329.
	Pang G F, Liang S X, Chang Q Y, et al. Assessment of Safety of Marketed Fruits and Vegetables in China Based on Large Data Fusion Technology of Risk Value Automatic Calculation-Multidimensional Information Collection[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(03): 318-329.
5	Boon P E, Svensson K, Moussavian S, et al. Probabilistic Acute Dietary Exposure Assessments to Captan and Tolylfluanid Using Several European Food Consumption and Pesticide Concentration Databases[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2009, 47(12): 2890-2898.
6	Codex Alimentarius Commission. Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) and Risk Management Recommendations (RMRs) for Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods(CX/MRL2-2018)[EB/OL], 2018.
7	van der Voet H, van der Heijden G W A M, Bos P M J, et al. A Model for Probabilistic Health Impact Assessment of Exposure to Food Chemicals[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2009, 47(12): 2926-40.
8	Chen Z J, Xu Y P, Li N, et al. A National-Scale Cumulative Exposure Assessment of Organophosphorus Pesticides Through Dietary Vegetable Consumption in China[J]. Food Control. 2019, 104: 34-41.
9	陈志军, 刘艳, 钱永忠. 一种基于风险熵的农产品质量安全指数构建方法及装置[S]. 国家知识产权局. 申请号: 202011194456.8.
	Chen Z J, Liu Y, Qian Y Z. A Method and Device for Constructing Agricultural Product Quality Safety Index Based on Risk Entropy[S]. State Intellectual Property Office. Application number: 202011194456.8.
10	冯端, 冯少彤. 溯源探幽：熵的世界[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
	Feng D, Feng S T. Tracing the Origin: The World of Entropy[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
11	Shannon C. E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication [J]. The Bell System Technical Journal,1948,27(3): 379-423.
12	郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及拓展[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
	Guo Y J. Comprehensive Evaluation Theory, Methods and Extensions[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
13	Li Y., Zhang Q., Wang L., et al. Regional Environmental Efficiency in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on Entropy Weight Method and Non-Parametric Models [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276(10): 124-147.
14	中华人民共和国农业部. 农产品分类与代码[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018.
	Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Classification and Codes of Agro-Products [S]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2018.
15	Vásquez-Ibarra Leonardo, Rebolledo-Leiva Ricardo, Angulo-Meza Lidia, et al. The Joint Use of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis Methodologies for Eco-Efficiency Assessment: A Critical Review, Taxonomy and Future Research [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 738(10): 139538.
16	Jang Woosik, Hwa-Uk Hong, Seung H. Han, et al. Optimal Supply Vendor Selection Model for LNG Plant Projects Using Fuzzy-TOPSIS Theory [J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2017, 33(2): 04016035.
17	张发明, 王梓玮, 谢小霞. 基于CW算子的区域可持续发展组合评价模型及应用[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(10): 70-77.
	Zhang F M, Wang Z W, Xie X X. Combined Evaluation Method of Regional Sustainable Development Based on CW Operator and Its Application[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(10): 70-77.

数据项	样本数（个）	品种/类别（个）	农药残留（个）
监测数据A	44,466	52	64
监测数据B	32,491	47	58
融合数据	76,957	42	68

农产品	L_i	排序	农产品	L_i	排序
芹菜 celery	0.1008	1	甜椒 sweet pepper	0.0288	22
长豇豆 asparagus bean	0.0927	2	茄子 eggplant	0.0283	23
韭菜 chinese chives	0.0843	3	苦瓜 balsam pear	0.0266	24
其他 others	0.0796	4	番茄 tomato	0.0262	25
叶用莴苣 leaf lettuce	0.0685	5	黄瓜 cucumber	0.0213	26
普通白菜 pak-choi	0.0656	6	杏鲍菇 king oyster mushroom	0.0209	27
蕹菜 water spinach	0.0643	7	花椰菜 cauliflower	0.0179	28
菠菜 spinach	0.0636	8	丝瓜 luffa	0.0164	29
大葱 welsh onion	0.0541	9	山药 chinese yam	0.0151	30
大白菜 chinese cabbage	0.0488	10	香菇 shiitake	0.015	31
细香葱 chive	0.0475	11	西葫芦 marrow	0.0146	32
辣椒 pepper	0.0452	12	结球甘蓝 cabbage	0.0136	33
茼蒿 garland chrysanthemum	0.0362	13	萝卜 radish	0.0136	34
茎用莴苣 asparagus lettuce	0.0357	14	双孢蘑菇 white mushroom	0.0135	35
平菇 oyster mushroom	0.0354	15	胡萝卜 carrot	0.0116	36
菜薹(心) flowering chinese cabbage	0.0354	16	马铃薯 potato	0.0097	37
菜豆 kidney bean	0.0346	17	洋葱 onion	0.0088	38
青花菜 broccoli	0.0334	18	秀珍菇 pleurotus geesteranus	0.0087	39
大蒜 garlic	0.0309	19	黑木耳 black fungus	0.008	40
姜 ginger	0.0305	20	金针菇 golden needle mushroom	0.0037	41
茶树菇 agrocybe cylindracea	0.0301	21	南瓜 pumpkin	0.0027	42

[1]	Xin Wang, Leifeng Guo. Application and Construction of Big Data Fusion Framework for Anti-poverty Monitoring: A Systematic View of Data, Models, and Applications [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(2): 108-118.
[2]	Jiali Li, Han Yang, Jianping Qian. An Credible Traceability System for Cold Chain Logistics Developed for China’s Agricultural Products in the Context of COVID-19 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 14-24.
[3]	Zhe Zhang, Xinting Yang, Helong Yu, Shanshan Li, Chuanheng Sun. Progress of Research to Develop a Traceability System for Fresh Agricultural Products Using Blockchain Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 25-34.
[4]	Xin Zhang, Xiangzhen Peng, Yue Li, Xiaoyi Wang, Zhiyao Zhao, Jiping Xu. Information Traceability Model for the Grain and Oil Food Supply Chain Based on Trusted Identification and Trusted Blockchain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 35-48.
[5]	Dasen Zhou, Jing Chen, Xin Zhang, Jilan Li, Zhicheng Li, Xiaodong Zheng, Weimin Gong, Ye Song. Research Status and Application Suggestions on Fruit and Vegetable Cold Chain Traceability System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 49-54.
[6]	Qian Zhang, Yihui Tian, Wen Xiao, Yan Lu. Application of Big Data Technology in Cold Chain Logistics of Agricultural Products [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 55-61.
[7]	Jia Liu, Xiaolei Xia, Lijuan Wang, Shu Wang, Xuefeng Lv, Changfa Lu, Li Sun, Sucai Li. Imported Cold Chain Food Traceability Management Platform and Innovative Application [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 69-76.
[8]	Chen Chen. Research on the Construction of a Traceability System for Imported Cold Chain Food Based on Blockchain Technology under COVID-19 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 77-81.
[9]	Qian Chen, Han Yang, Baogang Wang, Wensheng Li, Jianping Qian. Time Series Prediction of Cold-chain Transportation Temperature Based on GRU Neural Network Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 82-88.
[10]	Miao He, Xin Li, Zhiqiang Zhu, Jianying Feng. Modeling Table Grapes: Physicochemical Indexes and Sensory Quality Based on PCA-GA-SVR during Transportation Process [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 98-108.
[11]	Guozheng Hu, Zhabu Ganzhu, Peidong Yu, Zhenlin Yang, Qingzhu Gao. Research on Data Fusion in Agricultural Scientific Observation Based on of Agricultural Environment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2020, 2(4): 86-94.
[12]	Min Zuo, Siyu He, Qingchuan Zhang, Shuangshun Yao. Research on Food Source Traceability Technology Based on Blockchain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2020, 2(3): 52-60.
[13]	Yunting Li, Liangming Wen, Lili Zhang, Jianhui Li. The Status and Trends of Scientific Data Sharing Systems [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2019, 1(4): 86-97.
[14]	Feng Lu,Lihua Wang,Shuo Xu. Research on Construction of Fisheries Science Data Center [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2019, 1(3): 57-70.

Quantitative Evaluation of Agricultural Product Safety Based on Risk Entropy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 17

Related Articles 14

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0