农业大数据学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 506-518.doi: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.000117

• 数据管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

农村土地数据开发利用困境与法治进路探析

李长健(), 商守闯*()   

  1. 华中科技大学法学院/法律与公共政策研究院武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-23 修回日期:2025-07-02 出版日期:2025-12-26 发布日期:2025-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 商守闯,E-mail:2858017996@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李长健,E-mail: Changjian@hust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“深化基层矛盾纠纷化解共建共治机制及其风险预判研究”(18ZDA166);的阶段性成果;华中科技大学人文社会科学重大原创性成果培育项目“全面乡村振兴进程中农民土地权益保障研究”的阶段性成果(2022WKFZZX017)

An Analysis of the Dilemmas in the Development and Utilization of Rural Land Data and the Rule of Law Paths

LI ChangJian(), SHANG ShouChuang*()   

  1. School of Law/Institute for Law and Public Policy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2025-05-23 Revised:2025-07-02 Published:2025-12-26 Online:2025-12-26

摘要:

农村土地数据的数据化特征及其公共属性,决定了农村土地数据的开发利用区别于一般数据,并引发了对其开发利用主体、权利保护以及开发利用制度的重新审视。在我国农村土地场域中,农村土地数据的权利归属模糊不清、开发主体资格界定不明、价值导向不明与程序规范缺失等问题逐渐凸显。以上述现实困境为切入点,从制度和施行维度为农村土地数据要素的合法、有序开发利用提供理论和实践基础,通过剖析其背后的法律规制缺失、利益主体失衡、社会认知偏差与程序机制缺失等成因,构建农村土地数据法治体系尤为必要。据此提出要针对不同类型数据采用差异化的归属方案;明确开发主体的准入标准与退出机制;构建基于目的特定原则、比例原则以及最小限制与最大促进原则的数据使用机制,规范各类开发利用主体的利益行为;提出农村土地数据开发利用全过程程序性规范框架,旨在更好地保障各权利主体的权益,助力农业强国建设的长远目标。

关键词: 农村土地数据, 开发利用, 权利归属, 程序机制

Abstract:

The data characteristics and public attributes of rural land data determine that its development and utilization differ from general data, necessitating a re-examination of the subjects, rights protection, and institutional frameworks involved. In the domain of rural land in China, issues such as ambiguous rights attribution, undefined qualifications of development subjects, unclear value orientation, and a lack of procedural norms are increasingly prominent. Taking these realistic dilemmas as a starting point, it is essential to construct a rule of law system for rural land data. This paper provides theoretical and practical foundations for the lawful and orderly development of rural land data elements from institutional and implementation dimensions, by analyzing underlying causes such as the absence of legal regulations, stakeholder imbalances, social cognitive biases, and the lack of procedural mechanisms. Accordingly, the paper proposes: adopting differentiated attribution schemes for different data types; clarifying entry standards and exit mechanisms for development subjects; constructing data usage mechanisms based on the principles of purpose specification, proportionality, and “minimum restriction with maximum promotion” to regulate the interest behaviors of various development subjects; and establishing a whole-process procedural regulatory framework. These measures aim to better safeguard the rights and interests of all parties and contribute to the long-term goal of building a strong agricultural nation

Key words: rural land data, development and utilization, ownership rights, procedural mechanisms