基于AR眼镜和改进YOLOv8m-seg的田间小麦赤霉病严重度识别方法

展开
  • 北京金禾天成科技有限公司,北京 100027
徐玮,E-mail:appo@jinhetech.com
周佳良,E-mail:zhoujialiang2132@jinhetech.com

收稿日期: 2024-09-09

  录用日期: 2024-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-02

Severity Recognition Method of Field Wheat Fusarium Head Blight Based on AR Glasses and Improved YOLOv8m-seg

Expand
  • JinHeTech, Beijing 100027, China

Received date: 2024-09-09

  Accepted date: 2024-10-20

  Online published: 2024-12-02

摘要

及时发现小麦田间赤霉病发生情况并根据发病严重程度采取相应的防治措施,有利于提高小麦的产量和质量。当前识别小麦赤霉病严重度的方法大多基于一株或几株麦穗进行识别,这种方式由于效率较低不适用于田间调查。为解决该问题,该研究提出一种高效准确的田间小麦赤霉病严重度识别方法。通过引入CBAM注意力机制以改进YOLOv8m-seg模型的性能。利用改进的YOLOv8m-seg模型对采集的远景图像进行小麦麦穗实例分割,然后基于非目标抑制方法进行单株小麦麦穗切图,再利用改进的YOLOv8m-seg模型对每一株小麦麦穗中的病小穗和健康小穗进行实例分割,最后通过病小穗和健康小穗的数量计算每一株小麦麦穗的赤霉病严重度。为验证本文方法的有效性,构建了小麦麦穗(D-WE)和小麦小穗(D-WS)两个数据集进行测试。试验结果表明YOLOv8m-seg在两个数据集上的综合性能优于YOLOv8n-seg、YOLOv8s-seg、YOLOv8l-seg和YOLOv8x-seg。引入CBAM的模型优于引入SE、ECA和CA注意力机制的模型,与原模型相比,改进YOLOv8m-seg模型的平均精度均值在两个数据集上分别提高了0.9个百分点和1.2个百分点。该研究提出的小麦赤霉病严重度识别方法与其他三种识别方法相比严重度准确率分别提高了38.4个百分点、6.2个百分点和2.4个百分点,通过TensorRT将改进的YOLOv8m-seg模型部署后总算法耗时仅仅为原来的1/7。最后,该研究基于AR眼镜进行三地的小麦田间赤霉病严重度调查,调查结果表明,基于AR眼镜的小麦赤霉病智能识别平均病穗计数准确率高达0.953,且调查耗时仅为人工调查的1/3,充分说明了该研究提出方法的有效性,为智能化小麦赤霉病田间调查奠定良好的基础。

本文引用格式

徐玮, 周佳良, 钱啸, 符首夫 . 基于AR眼镜和改进YOLOv8m-seg的田间小麦赤霉病严重度识别方法[J]. 农业大数据学报, 2024 , 6(4) : 497 -508 . DOI: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.000065

Abstract

Timely detection of the severity of Fusarium head blight in the field and taking corresponding prevention and control measures based on the severity of the disease can improve the quality of wheat production. The current methods for identifying the severity of wheat Fusarium head blight are mostly based on identifying one or several wheat ears, which is not suitable for field investigations due to its low efficiency. To address this issue, the study proposes an efficient and accurate method for identifying the severity of wheat Fusarium head blight in the field. By introducing CBAM attention mechanism to improve the performance of YOLOv8m-seg model. Using the improved YOLOv8m-seg model to segment wheat ear instances in the collected distant images, and then using non target suppression method to cut individual wheat ear. Then, using the improved YOLOv8m-seg model to segment diseased and healthy spikelets in each wheat ear, the severity of Fusarium head blight in each wheat ear is calculated based on the number of diseased and healthy spikelets. To verify the effectiveness of the method proposed in this article, two datasets were constructed for testing, namely dateset of wheat ear (D-WE) and dateset of wheat spikelet (D-WS). The experimental results show that YOLOv8m-seg has better overall performance than YOLOv8n-seg, YOLOv8s-seg, YOLOv8l-seg, and YOLOv8x-seg on two datasets. The model that introduces CBAM is superior to the model that introduces SE, ECA, and CA attention mechanisms. Compared with the original model, the mean average precision of the improved YOLOv8m-seg model has increased by 0.9 percentage points and 1.2 percentage points on two datasets, respectively. The severity recognition method for Fusarium head blight proposed in this study has improved the severity accuracy by 38.4 percentage points, 6.2 percentage points, and 2.4 percentage points compared to the other three recognition methods. After deploying the improved YOLOv8m-seg model through TensorRT inference framework, the total algorithm time consumed is only 1/7 of the original. Finally, this study conducted a investigation on the severity of wheat Fusarium head blight in three locations based on AR glasses. The results showed that the average counting accuracy of intelligent identification of wheat Fusarium head blight based on AR glasses was as high as 0.953, and the investigation time is one-third of the manual investigation time. This fully demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method and lays a good foundation for intelligent field investigation of wheat Fusarium head blight.

参考文献

[1] 王成社, 张保军, 单明珠. 入世后我国小麦生产面临的挑战及其对策[J]. 水土保持研究, 2002(2):67-69.
[2] 黄冲, 姜玉英, 吴佳文, 等. 2018年我国小麦赤霉病重发特点及原因分析[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(2):160-163.
[3] 陈云, 王建强, 杨荣明, 等. 小麦赤霉病发生危害形势及防控对策[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(5):11-17.
[4] 商鸿生, 张文军, 井金学. 小麦赤霉病菌源的田间分布型和取样调查方法[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1991(S1):66-70.
[5] 姚建斌, 张英娜, 刘建华. 基于卷积神经网络和迁移学习的小麦病虫害识别[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(2): 102-108.
[6] 刘奕. 计算机视觉技术在农作物病虫害检测中的运用研究[J]. 科技资讯, 2024, 22(13):154-156.
[7] 毛锐, 张宇晨, 王泽玺, 等. 利用改进Faster-RCNN识别小麦条锈病和黄矮病[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(17):176-185.
[8] 马超伟, 张浩, 马新明, 等. 基于改进YOLOv8的轻量化小麦病害检测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(5):187-195.
[9] 温艳兰, 陈友鹏, 王克强, 等. 基于机器视觉的病虫害检测综述[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2022, 37(10):271-279.
[10] 周善良, 李锐. 基于卷积神经网络的农作物病虫害识别研究综述[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2024, 4(17):39-45.
[11] 慕君林, 马博, 王云飞, 等. 基于深度学习的农作物病虫害检测算法综述[J]. 农业机械学报, 2023, 54(S2):301-313.
[12] 徐博文, 童孟军. 基于改进的Faster R-CNN的小麦麦穗检测识别[J]. 湘潭大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(4):48-59.
[13] 韩弘炜, 张漪埌, 齐立萍. 基于卷积神经网络的农作物病虫害检测综述[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2023, 3(6):6-9.
[14] 高伟锋. 基于YOLOv8的柑橘病虫害识别系统研究与设计[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2023, 3(15):27-30.
[15] 杨锋, 姚晓通. 基于改进YOLOv8的小麦叶片病虫害检测轻量化模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(1):147-157.
[16] 邓国强, 王君婵, 杨俊, 等. 基于图像和改进U-net模型的小麦赤霉病穗识别[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(11):1432-1440.
[17] 张正华, 吴宇, 金志琦. 基于MHSA-YOLOv7的小麦赤霉病感染率检测[J]. 无线电工程, 2024, 54(1):71-77.
[18] 鲍文霞, 孙庆, 胡根生, 等. 基于多路卷积神经网络的大田小麦赤霉病图像识别[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11):174-181.
[19] 陈鹏, 马子涵, 章军, 等. 融合注意力机制的小麦赤霉病语义分割网络[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(4):145-152.
[20] 高君, 张正华, 邵明, 等. 基于改进YOLOv5s的小麦赤霉病检测方法[J]. 信息与电脑(理论版), 2023, 35(12):61-65.
[21] 戴雨舒, 仲晓春, 孙成明, 等. 基于图像处理和Deeplabv3+模型的小麦赤霉病识别[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(9):209-215.
[22] GB/T 15796-2011,小麦赤霉病测报技术规范[S].
文章导航

/