基于幼苗图像分析鉴定水稻品种旱直播耐深播特性

doi:10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.190203

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】本文基于幼苗图像分析建立鉴定水稻耐深播相关特性的方法,鉴定旱直播条件下水稻耐深播的农艺性状。【方法】以不同中胚轴伸长能力的18份水稻品种和稗草、马唐的种子,设置3cm、5cm、7cm、9cm和11cm深度的砂培试验,观察出苗情况并在播种后第15天摄取幼苗照片,采用图像分析技术提取幼苗生长相关的表型指标。【结果】在人工标记幼苗胚芽鞘节等部位前提下,通过图像分析可一次性测定中胚轴长度和累积绿叶投射面积;当播种深度为3cm时,短中胚轴水稻品种能在播后第6天前后出苗,长中胚轴品种能在播后第5天出苗;播种深度为5-7cm时,短中胚轴品种不能正常出苗,长中胚轴品种能在播后第7-10天出苗;在同等播种深度下长中胚轴品种第15天幼苗叶面积高于短中胚轴品种,在7cm以上播种深度下差异极为明显;稗草和马唐都具有幼苗中胚轴伸长能力,种子能从5cm或3cm深度下正常出苗。【结论】基于幼苗图像分析技术,本试验建立了水稻旱直播耐深播相关指标的表型检测方法,识别幼苗中胚轴和叶片等部位,提取中胚轴长度和累积绿叶投射面积指标。水稻差异性代表品种和常见禾本科杂草的观察结果表明中胚轴伸长能力是深播后快速、整齐出苗并较早形成自养能力的关键。

关键词: 水稻, 杂草, 中胚轴伸长, 旱直播, 图像分析, 植物表型组学, 表型

Abstract:

[Objective] The major objectives of the experiment is to develop protocols of seedling image analysis to evaluate characteristics related to tolerance to deep sowing under dry direct sowing condition in rice. [Methods] Seeds of eighteen rice varieties with varied mesocotyl elongation and barnyard grass, crab grass were used in sand culture with 5 sowing depths of 3cm, 5cm, 7cm, 9cm, and 11cm. Seedling emergence was recorded each day. Digital images of seedling were obtained 15 days after sowing (DAS), and used to measure phenotypic parameters related to seedling growth based on image analysis. [Results] The protocol of image analysis is effective to obtain mesocotyl length and total leaf projected area simultaneously. Under 3cm sowing depth, seedlings of rice varieties without mesocotyl elongation were able to emerge on 6 DAS while seedlings with elongated mesocotyl emerged on 5 DAS. Under 5-7cm sowing depth, rice varieties without mesocotyl elongation failed to emerge while varieties with elongated mesocotyl delivered emerged seedlings on 7-10 DAS. The total leaf projected areas of 15 DAS seedlings were higher in varieties with mesocotyl elongation than varieties with short mesocotyl under same sowing depth. The differences were very noticeable under 7cm or higher sowing depths. Mesocotyl elongation was observed in both barnyard grass and crab grass seedlings that led to seedling emergence from 5cm and 3cm sowing depth, respectively. [Conclusion] Phenotyping protocol was developed to evaluated deep-sowing tolerance related parameters based on seedling image analysis. Mesocotyl length and total leaf projected area were measured after recognition of different parts like mesocotyl and leaves of the seedlings. Investigation on representative rice varieties and grass weeds indicated the key role of mesocotyl elongation on quick, uniform seedling emergence after deep sowing, and the early development of autotrophic capacity.

Key words: Oryza sativa L., weed, mesocotyl elongation, dry direct sowing, image analysis, plant phenomics, phenotyping

中图分类号:

冯芳君,严明,沈国辉,陈振挺,田志慧,范佩清,梅捍卫. 基于幼苗图像分析鉴定水稻品种旱直播耐深播特性[J]. 农业大数据学报, 2019, 1(2): 32-40.

Fangjun Feng,Ming Yan,Guohui Shen,Zhenting Chen,Zhihui Tian,Peiqing Fan,Hanwei Mei. Investigation on tolerance to deep dry sowing of rice varieties based on analysis of seedling images[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2019, 1(2): 32-40.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

参考文献 31

[1]	Farooq M, Siddique KHM, Rehman H , et al. Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2011,111(2):87-98.
[2]	Haque AFME, Hamid A, Islam MT , et al. Seedbed characteristics and seeding depth effects on emergence and seedling vigour of upland rice[J]. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science, 2010,168(1):61-64.
[3]	倪道理, 沈庆雷 . 播种深度对机械旱直播水稻的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013, ( 18):36.
	Ni D L, Shen Q L . Influence of sowing depth on mechanized dry direct sown rice[J]. Modern Agricultural Science And Technology, 2013, ( 18):36.
[4]	信彩云, 周学标, 刘奇华等. 不同直播方式对水稻出苗状况的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(3):75-78.
	Xin C Y, Zhou X B, Liu Q H , et al. Influence of different sowing methods on rice seedling emergence[J]. Shangdong Agricultural Science, 2017,49(3):75-78.
[5]	Sanusan S, Polthanee A, Seripong S , et al. Seedling establishment and yield of direct-seeded rice under different seeding depths[J]. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 2009,37:15-22.
[6]	Redona ED, Mackill DJ . Mapping quantitative trait loci for seedling vigor in rice using RFLPs[J]. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 1996,92(3-4):395-402.
[7]	Wu M-G, Zhang G-H, Lin J-R , et al. Screening for rice germplasms with specially-elongated mesocotyl[J]. Rice Science, 2005,12(3):226-228.
[8]	Wu J, Feng F, Lian X , et al. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of mesocotyl elongation based on re-sequencing approach in rice[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2015,15(1):218.
[9]	Luo J, Tang SQ, Pei-Song HU , et al. Analysis on factors affecting seedling establishment in rice[J]. Rice Science, 2007,14(1):27-32.
[10]	Lu Q, Zhang M, Niu X , et al. Uncovering novel loci for mesocotyl elongation and shoot length in indica rice through genome-wide association mapping[J]. Planta, 2015,243(3):1-13.
[11]	虎锋, 武菊英, 王庆海等. 土壤温湿度和埋藏深度对马唐出苗的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2004,19(3):92-95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2004.03.023
	Hu F, Wu J Y, Wang Q H , et al. Soil temperature, soil moisture and seed burial depth effects on common crabgrass emergence. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2004,19(3):92-95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2004.03.023
[12]	Nosratti I, Amiri S, Bagheri A , et al. Environmental factors affecting seed germination and seedling emergence of foxtail sophora (sophora alopecuroides)[J]. Weed Science, 2018,66(1):1-7.
[13]	朱金文, 董祺瑞, 刘冰等. 土壤水分、淹水深度与盖土厚度对抗药性耳叶水苋种子出苗的影响[J]. 杂草学报, 2014(1):39-41.
	Zhu J W, Dong Q R, Liu B , et al. Effect of soil moisture, submersion depth and soil thickness on seed germination of herbicide resistant Ammannia arenaria[J]. Weed Science, 2014, ( 1):39-41.
[14]	马殿荣, 王楠, 王莹等. 中国北方杂草稻深覆土条件下出苗动力源分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008,22(2):215-218.
	Ma DL, Wang N, Wang Y , et al. Germination dynamics of weedy rice in northern China at different sowing depths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 22(2):215-218.
[15]	Van Der Walt S, Schonberger J, Nunez-Iglesias J , et al., Scikit-image: Image processing in python. Vol. 2. 2014.
[16]	Otsu N , A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Vol. 9. 1979. 62-66.
[17]	Huang M, Zhang R, Chen J , et al. Morphological and physiological traits of seeds and seedlings in two rice cultivars with contrasting early vigor[J]. Plant Production Science, 2016,20(1):1-7.
[18]	Asch F, Sow A, Dingkuhn M . Reserve mobilization, dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area in seedlings of african rice cultivars differing in early vigor[J]. Field Crops Research, 1999,62(2-3):191-202.
[19]	Namuco OS, Cairns JE, Johnson DE . Investigating early vigour in upland rice (oryza sativa L.): Part I. Seedling growth and grain yield in competition with weeds[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009,113(3):197-206.
[20]	Mgonja M, Dilday R, Skinner S , et al. Association of mesocotyl elongation with seedling vigor in rice.[J]. Proceeding of Arkansas Academy of Sciences , 1988,42:52-55.
[21]	Alibu S . Relationship between coleoptile and mesocotyl elongation of upland rice (oryza sativa L.) seedlings under submergence and soil-sand culture[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011,6(31):6463-6472.
[22]	Duan L, Han J, Guo Z , et al. Novel digital features discriminate between drought resistant and drought sensitive rice under controlled and field conditions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018,9:492.
[23]	Tomé F, Jansseune K, Saey B , et al. rosettR: Protocol and software for seedling area and growth analysis[J]. Plant Methods, 2017,13(1):13.
[24]	Yang W, Guo Z, Huang C , et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice[J]. Nature Communications, 2014,5(6):5087.
[25]	Campbell M, Knecht A, Berger B , et al., Integrating image-based phenomics and association analysis to dissect the genetic architecture of temporal salinity responses in rice. Plant Physiology, 168: 1476 - 1489. 2015.
[26]	Pace J, Lee N, Naik HS , et al. Analysis of maize (zea mays L.) seedling roots with the high-throughput image analysis tool ARIA (automatic root image analysis)[J]. Plos One, 2014,9(9):e108255.
[27]	Das A, Schneider H, Burridge J , et al. Digital imaging of root traits (DIRT): A high-throughput computing and collaboration platform for field-based root phenomics[J]. Plant Methods, 2015,11(51):1-12.
[28]	Cole B, Kay SA, Chory J . Automated analysis of hypocotyl growth dynamics during shade avoidance in arabidopsis[J]. Plant Journal for Cell & Molecular Biology, 2011,65(6):991-1000.
[29]	李茹, 赵桂东, 汪立新等. 旱直播稻田杂草发生规律及防除技术研究[J]. 杂草学报, 2007(4):31-32.
	Li R, Zhao G D, Wang L X , et al. Study on weed occurance regularity and control techniques in dry direct sowing rice field. Weed Science, 2007, ( 4):31-32.
[30]	钱新民, 张洪进, 易红娟 . 旱直播稻田化除效果的影响因素[J]. 杂草学报, 2006(4):32-34.
	Qian X M, Zhang H J, Yi H J , et al. Factors influencing effect of chemical control of weeds in dry direct sowing rice field. Weed Science, 2006, ( 4):32-34.
[31]	张家驯, 张颂函 . 浅耕旱条播稻田杂草发生与化除技术研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2000,16(4):64-69.
	Zhang J X, Zhang S H . Studies on weed occurance in post-light-tillage direct-drilled dry rice field and corresponding chemical weed control techniques. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 16(4):64-69.

不同播种深度下“播种- 出苗”天数
品种名称	3 cm	5cm	7cm	9cm	1 1 cm
沪旱15	6.7	8.3	X	X	X
赤壳糯	5.7	X	X	X	X
细白粘	7.7	X	X	X	X
曰本晴	6.7	X	X	X	X
MTU9	5.0	6.0	X	X	X
Kasalath	6.0	6.3	8.0	X	X
旱恢3号	6.7	7.3	X	X	X
Azer.	7.0	9.7	10.0	X	X
Jhona349	5.7	6.7	8.3	X	X
P737	5.3	6.7	9.0	X	X
八月糯	6.7	6.7	X	X	X
Karkati87	5.7	6.0	7.0	X	X
Phudugey	6.3	7.0	8.7	X	X
Goria	5.3	6.3	7.3	7.7	X
扎西马	5.0	5.3	7.0	8.7	10.0
云陆8号	6.0	7.0	8.3	X	X
麻谷子	6.7	8.3	11.0	X	X
CA902B21	5.0	6.3	7.3	8.3	X
稗草	4.7	8.7	X	X	X
马唐	4.7	X	X	X	X