基于文献计量的丛枝菌根真菌对植物抗性影响的研究态势分析

doi:10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.230216

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper adopts the scientometric analysis method to the research state and explore the trends of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in improving plant to stress based on the, using the scientific measurement method of big data to conduct quantitative analysis and visualization of Chinese and English literature in the past 30 years (1991-2021) in Web of Science and CNKI databases. The changes in the number of literatures, national and institutional cooperation networks, research hotspots and research trends in the field of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal resistance are visually displayed. The results showed as follows: 1) The research on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal resistance has been paid more attention by researchers, and the most frequent keywords are “salt stress” and “drought stress”, which are the hot research directions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal resistance; 2) The major domestic and foreign research institutes are focused on the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northwest A&F University and Yangtze University) and other universities and research institutes; 3) The study of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on heavy metal stress and their synergistic effects with other microorganisms have gradually become a research hotspot.

Key words: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant resistance research, scientometric

MA Jun, LI Shan, CAO Kai, BAO EnCai, HE ChaoXing. Analysis of the Research Status of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Adverse Resistance Based on Scientometric Tools[J].Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2023, 5(2): 109-121.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Fig. 3

Table 3

Fig. 4

Table 4

Knowledge clusters in field of AMF tolerance based on keywords co-occurence from WOS"

聚类编号 Cluster ID	聚类大小 Cluster size	同质性 Silhouette	平均年份 Mean year	聚类标签 LLR based cluster label	主要关键词 Main keywords
#0	55	0.871	1995	drought resistance	drought resistance; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; nutrient uptake; water use; soluble sugars
#1	40	0.883	1997	salinity	salinity; stress; inoculation; arid soil; organic solutes
#2	39	0.874	1997	heavy metals	heavy metals; soil contamination; thymus polytrichus (wild thyme); saprobe fungi; soil contamination
#3	38	0.913	1998	water stress	water stress; drought stress; trehalose; abiotic stress; oxidative stress
#4	38	0.891	1997	root	root; glomus mosseae; succinate dehydrogenase; organic matter; aspergillus niger
#5	37	0.992	1998	photosynthesis	photosynthesis; potassium; photochemistry; silicon; melon
#6	35	0.96	1998	gene expression	gene expression; nitrogen (n); induced systemic resistance; biocontrol; tomato
#7	33	0.936	1996	morphology	morphology; ozone; acer-saccharum; temperature; seedling nutrition
#8	33	0.915	1996	oxidative stress	oxidative stress; antioxidant enzymes; antioxidant enzyme; proline; mutualism
#9	31	0.908	1994	glomus intraradices	glomus intraradices; disease resistance; phenolic compounds; vigna unguiculata; 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase
#10	29	0.937	1998	salt stress	salt stress; water stress; salinity stress; soil salinity; plant tolerance
#11	28	0.917	1994	indirect effects	indirect effects; phosphorus nutrition; epilachna varivestis; biomass allocation; vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus
#12	27	0.988	1999	RNA analysis	rna analysis; rhizoctonia solani; defence-related genes; induced resistance; glomus intraradices
#13	24	0.963	1994	ferulic acid	ferulic acid; iron; phosphate starvation; root growth; ethylene biosynthesis
#14	21	0.978	1995	colonization	colonization; antioxidant enzyme; mycorrhiza-induced resistance; diversity; biological control
#15	20	0.971	2000	chickpea	chickpea; antioxidants; cadmium; lipid peroxidation; photosynthesis
#16	13	1.000	1995	copper tolerance	copper tolerance; vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza; agrostis capillaris; mine soils; nitrogen assimilation
#18	8	0.962	1992	starch	starch; cations; solutes; water stress; wheat cultivar
#20	5	0.995	1996	stable isotopes	stable isotopes; acacia tortilis; tropical trees; drought tolerance; mycorrhiza
#22	5	0.993	1993	nontarget effects	nontarget effects; transgenic plants; pr proteins; mycorrhizal susceptibility; disease resistance

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 6

References 29

[1]	SCHÜßLER A, Schwarzott D, WALKER C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution[J]. Mycological Research, 2001, 105(12): 1413-1421. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201005196
[2]	Jiang Y N, Wang W X, Xie Q J, et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi[J]. Science, 2017, 356(6343): 1172-1175. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9970 pmid: 28596307
[3]	Wu Q S, Xia R X, Zou Y N, et al. Osmotic solute responses of mycorrhizal citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings to drought stress[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2007, 29(6): 543-549. doi: 10.1007/s11738-007-0065-y
[4]	Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea J M, et al. Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought-tolerant or drought-sensitive glomus species[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2007, 54(3): 543-552. pmid: 17431706
[5]	He Z Q, He C X, Zhang Z B, et al. Changes of antioxidative enzymes and cell membrane osmosis in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizae under NaCl stress[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2007, 59(2): 128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.023
[6]	Joner E J, Briones R, Leyval C, et al. Metal-binding capacity of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 226(2): 227-234. doi: 10.1023/A:1026565701391
[7]	Guinee J B, Heijungs R, Huppes G, et al. Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45(1): 90-96. doi: 10.1021/es101316v pmid: 20812726
[8]	Mariotte P, Canarini A, Dijkstra F A. Stoichiometric N: P flexibility and mycorrhizal symbiosis favour plant resistance against drought[J]. The Journal of Ecology, 2017, 105(4): 958-967. doi: 10.1111/jec.2017.105.issue-4
[9]	Hammer E C, Forstreuter M, Rillig M C, et al. Biochar increases arbuscular mycorrhizal plant growth enhancement and ameliorates salinity stress[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 96(1): 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.014
[10]	Li H, Chen X W, Wu L, et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on redox homeostasis of rice under Cd stress[J]. Plant Soil, 2020, 455(1): 121-138. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04678-y
[11]	Wang M Y, Xia R X, Hu L M, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate iron deficient chlorosis in Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf under calcium bicarbonate stress[J]. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2007, 82(5): 776-780. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512304
[12]	Pallara G, Todeschini V, Lingua G, et al. Transcript analysis of stress defence genes in a white poplar clone inoculated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and grown on a polluted soil[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 63(1): 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.11.016
[13]	Guillon C, Starnaud M, Hamel C, et al. Differential and systemic alteration of defence-related gene transcript levels in mycorrhizal bean plants with rhizoctonia solani[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2011, 80(3): 305-315. doi: 10.1139/b02-015
[14]	Berta G, Copetta A, Gamalero E, et al. Maize development and grain quality are differentially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth promoting pseudomonad in the field[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2014, 24(3): 161-170. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0523-x
[15]	Noceta P A, Bettenfeld P, Boussageon R, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, a key symbiosis in the development of quality traits in crop production,alone or combined with plant growthpromoting bacteria[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2021, 31(6): 655-669. doi: 10.1007/s00572-021-01054-1
[16]	Parada J, Valenzuela T, Gómez F, et al. Effect of fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on antioxidant profiles and activities in Fragaria ananassa fruit[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 99(3): 1397-1404. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2019.99.issue-3
[17]	Egamberdieva D. Pseudomonas chlororaphis: a salt tolerant bacterial inoculant for plant growth stimulation under saline soil conditions[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2012, 34(2): 751-756. doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0875-9
[18]	Egamberdieva D, Berg G, Lindström K, et al. Alleviation of salt stress of symbiotic Galega officinalis L. (goat’s rue) by co-inoculation of Rhizobium with root-colonizing Pseudomonas [J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 369(1-2): 453-465. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1586-3
[19]	Egamberdieva D, Jabborova D, Berg G. Synergistic interactions between Bradyrhizobium japonicum and the endophyte Stenotrophomonas rhizophila and their effects on growth, and nodulation and nutrition of soybean under salt stress[J]. Plant and Soil, 2016, 405(1-2): 35-45. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2661-8
[20]	Zhou Y, Li X, Gao Y, et al. Plant endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant competition[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(5): 1168-1179. doi: 10.1111/fec.2018.32.issue-5
[21]	Angela H. Microbial ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhiza[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2000, 32(2): 91-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00702.x pmid: 10817861
[22]	杨柳, 李广枝, 童倩倩, 等. Pb²⁺、Cd²⁺胁迫作用下蚯蚓、菌根菌及其联合作用对植物修复的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(11): 156-158.
	Yang L, Li G Z, Tong Q Q, et al. Effects of earthworm, mycorrhizal fungi and combined action on phytoremediation under Pb²⁺ and Cd²⁺ stress[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(11): 156-158. (in Chinese)
[23]	沈浜凯, 肖龙云, 冯乃杰, 等. 黄腐酸和真菌对玉米幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(5): 64-66.
	Shen B K, Xiao L Y, Feng N J, et al. Effects of fulvic acid and fungi on drought resistance of maize seedlings[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(5): 64-66. (in Chinese)
[24]	韩亚楠, 刘润进, 李敏. AM真菌和PGPR菌剂组合对低温胁迫下黄瓜生长及防御酶活性的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014, 1(7): 35-39.
	Han Y N, Liu R J, Li M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pgpr combination agents on growth and defense enzyme activity of cucumber under low temperature stress[J]. China Vegetables, 2014, 1(7): 35-39. (in Chinese)
[25]	王丽丽, 杨谦. 接种枯草芽孢杆菌和丛枝菌根真菌促进红三叶修复石油污染土壤[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(5): 526-529.
	Wang L L, Yang Q. Inoculation with Bacillus subtilis and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promoted the remediation of oil contaminated soil by red clover[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(5): 526-529. (in Chinese)
[26]	邢易梅, 蕫理, 战力峰, 等. 混合接种摩西球囊霉和根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿耐碱能力的影响[J]. 草业学报[J], 2020, 29(9): 136-145. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019509
	Xing Y M, Dong L, Zhan L F, et al. Effect of mixed inoculation of Glomus mosseae and Sinorhizobium melilotion alkali resistance on alfalfa[J]. Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(9): 136-145. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019509
[27]	闫智臣, 李应德, 程维佳, 等. 不同盐浓度下AM真菌和禾草内生真菌对多年生黑麦草生长的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(1): 63-70.
	Yan Z C, Li Y D, Cheng W J, et al. Effects of AM fungi and grass endophyte on the growth of ryegrass under different salt concentrations[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(1): 63-70. (in Chinese)
[28]	吴福勇, 武玉坤, 毕银丽, 等. 水分胁迫下AM真菌和根瘤菌对沙打旺生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(4): 161-166.
	Wu F Y, Wu Y K, Bi Y L, et al. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium on the growth and nutrition uptake of Astragalus adsurgens Pall. Under water stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(4): 161-166. (in Chinese)
[29]	刘耀臣, 陈可, 于伟红, 等. 水杨酸和AM真菌增强黄瓜耐低温的效应[J]. 北方园艺, 2020, 1(10): 10-15.
	Liu Y C, Chen K, Yu W H, et al. Effects of salicylic acid and AM fungi on cucumber tolerance to low temperature[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020, 1(10):10-15. (in Chinese)

序号 No.	国家 Country	发文量 Records	中介中心性 Centrality
1	P R CHINA	402	0.22
2	USA	191	0.47
3	SPAIN	173	0.37
4	INDIA	152	0.19
5	IRAN	130	0.10
6	GERMANY	84	0.36
7	EGYPT	72	0.02
8	ITALY	71	0.13
9	FRANCE	70	0.14
10	CANADA	65	0.07

序号 No.	研究机构 Research affiliations	发文量 Records	中介中心性 Centrality
1	CSIC	109	0.17
2	Chinese Academy of Sciences	79	0.20
3	Northwest A&F University	54	0.04
4	Yangtze University	48	0.03
5	King Saud University	39	0.11
6	University of Chinese Academy of Sciences	28	0.04
7	Panjab University	26	0.00
8	Islamic Azad University	25	0.03
9	University Hradec Kralove	25	0.00

序号 No.	研究机构 Research affiliations	发文量 Records	中介中心性 Centrality
1	中国科学院	43	0.41
2	青岛农业大学	30	0.02
3	西南大学	23	0.08
4	西北农林科技大学	22	0.29
5	贵州大学	21	0.17
6	中国矿业大学（北京）	17	0.04
7	河北大学	14	0.01
8	兰州大学	14	0.00
9	中国农业大学	14	0.27
10	华中农业大学	14	0.03

Analysis of the Research Status of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Adverse Resistance Based on Scientometric Tools

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 29

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

聚类编号 Cluster ID	聚类大小 Cluster size	同质性 Silhouette	平均年份 Mean year	聚类标签 LLR based cluster label	主要关键词 Main keywords
#0	34	0.975	2011	盐胁迫	盐胁迫; 叶绿素; 尖瓣海莲; 白三叶; 大豆
#1	27	0.947	2014	干旱	干旱; 外生菌根; 酸度; 羊草; 土壤
#2	26	0.970	2007	抗旱性	抗旱性; 内生真菌; 沙棘; 可溶性糖; 保护酶活性
#3	25	0.946	2012	低温胁迫	低温胁迫; 光合作用; 叶绿素荧光; 根系形态; 玉米
#4	24	0.951	2007	枳实生苗	枳实生苗; 低磷胁迫; 宿根高粱; 水分胁迫; 铯胁迫
#5	24	0.951	2012	干旱胁迫	干旱胁迫; 生长量; 香椿; 黄土高原煤矿区; 根系性状
#6	21	0.954	2006	耐盐性	耐盐性; 生物量; 棉花; 苍术; 大叶女贞
#7	20	0.962	2008	抗逆性	抗逆性; 植物; 共生; 吸收能力; 促进生长
#8	19	0.882	2009	生长	生长; 向日葵; am真菌; 植物激素; 钠盐胁迫
#9	18	0.940	2011	内源激素	内源激素; 生理生化; 实生苗; 桃叶杜鹃; am菌根
#10	15	0.933	2012	抗氧化酶	抗氧化酶; 紫花苜蓿; 保水剂; 宁夏枸杞; 柑橘根砧
#11	14	0.982	2011	促生作用	促生作用; 耐旱性; 互作机制; 生态功能; 多样性
#12	14	0.976	2008	抗性	抗性; 重金属; 耐性; 综述; 保护酶
#13	6	0.980	2014	美洲黑杨	美洲黑杨; 雌雄异株; 镉污染; 复合污染; 雌雄异株植物

关键词 Keyword	强度 Strength	开始年份 Begin	结束年份 End
infection	41.24	1991	2009
root	12.95	1991	2004
phosphorus	11.22	1991	2004
water relation	6.79	1991	2007
phosphorus nutrition	4.56	1991	1997
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae	4.56	1994	1999
acquisition	3.96	1994	2008
Glomus mosseae	12.97	1995	2014
glomus	5.78	1996	2010
colonization	7.94	2001	2009
Glumus intraradice	8.45	2005	2012
phaseolus vulgaris	4.35	2006	2010
tomato	6.03	2007	2014
aggregate stability	4.31	2013	2017
induced resistance	4.03	2013	2017
rhizophagus irregulari	4.67	2015	2019
Zea mays I.	4.61	2015	2019
jasmonic acid	4.11	2015	2019
physiological response	4.72	2016	2021
rhizophagus intraradice	4.12	2016	2017
mechanism	3.88	2016	2021
piriformospora indica	4.06	2017	2021
growh promoting rhizobacteria	3.97	2017	2021
bacteria	4.18	2019	2021
water use efficiency	3.96	2019	2021
抗旱性	3.81	1995	2007
水分胁迫	3.8	2003	2009
抗氧化酶	3.75	2017	2019