The review process
Initial appraisal and a plagiarism check of a submitted manuscript are done by the Editorial Department, and the Paper that don’t meet our requirements will be rejected. If it is deemed acceptable, the paper will be sent out to at least two reviewers from the area for technical comments. If considered necessary by these two reviewers, the paper will be sent to the editorial board for final review. The final decision will be based on the review opinions of experts and the demand of the journal.
Re-review
In some cases, the revised version will be sent to referees for re-review to guarantee the quality of it. According to the list of changes and any replies for transmission submitted by authors, referees will give the final advice on whether to accept or not.
Reviewers
When selecting reviewers, our journal will consider their professional knowledge, academic justice, strong sense of responsibility, review efficiency, and whether they can give specific suggestions. After comprehensive consideration, the manuscript will be sent to the most appropriate reviewers.
Double-blind Review System
Our journal adopts the double-blind rule, the author's information is confidential to the reviewer, and the reviewer's information is confidential to the author. At the same time, details of the reviewed paper must be kept confidential by reviewers.
