Journal of Agricultural Big Data >
Fruit Quality Analysis of 23 Apple Germplasm Resources
Received date: 2022-04-25
Online published: 2022-11-08
Objective In recent years, fruit quality is the main factor of the apple market competitiveness, and the diversity of fruit quality traits in different apple germplasm resources is studied and analyzed to cultivate new varieties and create new germplasm. Methods Twenty-three apple germplasms were evaluated for differences in fruit quality indicators including individual fruit weight, firmness without skin, soluble solid content, vitamin C, soluble sugar content, titratable acidity,TSS/TA. Meanwhile, these quality indicators were analyzed by correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Results The results showed that the seven quality indicators revealed a significant difference among 23 different apple germplasm. There is a significantly positive correlation between titratable acidity and vitamin C. There is a significantly positive correlation between titratable acidity and individual fruit weight. There is a significantly negative correlation between TSS/TA and vitamin C. There is a significantly negative correlation between TSS/TA and titratable acidity as well. Three major components with a characteristic value larger than 1 during PCA were extracted and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 73.21%. The first principal component represented TSS/TA, vitamin C, titratable acidity; the second principal component represented individual fruit weight; the third principal component represented firmness without skin, soluble solid content, soluble sugar content. Conclusion There is significant difference in seven fruits quality traits of twenty-three apple germplasm resources. Different germplasm has different typical traits. In these 23 apple germplasm resources, the fruit size of 'Yan Guang' is the highest. 'Huang Taiping' has the highest firmness without skin and soluble solid content. ‘Suan Wang' has the highest content of acid and vitamin C. ‘Zhang Jiakouduanzhi' has the highest soluble sugar content. The TSS/TA of 'Guo Shuai' is the highest.
Key words: apple germplasm resources; fruit quality traits; diversity
Simiao Sun, Yuan Gao, Kun Wang, Dajiang Wang, Lianwen Li . Fruit Quality Analysis of 23 Apple Germplasm Resources[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022 , 4(2) : 13 -19 . DOI: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.220202
| 1 | 王楠, 张静, 于蕾, 等. 仁果类果树资源育种研究进展Ⅱ:苹果种质资源、品质发育及遗传育种研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(04): 801-812. |
| 1 | Wang N, Zhang J, Yu L, et al. Progress on the Resource Breeding of Kernel Fruits Ⅱ:Progress on the Germplasm Resources,Quality Development and Genetic Breeding of Apple in China[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(04): 801-812. |
| 2 | 张学超,任海龙,唐式敏,等.伊犁天山160份野苹果种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(06):1521-1530. |
| 2 | Zhang X C, Ren H L, Tang S M, et al. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Traits in 160 Germplasm Resources ofMalus sieversii(Ledeb.)M. Roem. from Tianshan in Ili[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(06):1521-1530. |
| 3 | 陈美霞,陈学森.果树果实风味物质组成及其遗传的研究进展[C].中国园艺学会第六届青年学术讨论会论文集,杨陵,2004:226-230. |
| 4 | 郭珊珊. 苹果品质评价和气候区划进展分析[J]. 农村.农业.农民(B版), 2020,(09): 55-56. |
| 4 | Guo S S. Apple quality evaluation and climate zoning progress analysis[J]. Country Agriculture Farmer, 2020,(09): 55-56. |
| 5 | 王迪,童盼盼,张亚若,等.5种新疆苹果资源的果实品质性状比较与评价[J].西北植物报,2021,41(03):416-430. |
| 5 | Wang D, Tong P P, Zhang Y R, et al. Comparison and evaluation of Fruit quality traits of five apples resources from Xinjiang[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2021,41(03):416-430. |
| 6 | 王向斌, 周会玲, 张晓晓, 等. 苹果果实品质形成及影响因素分[J].北方园艺,2015,(13):186-189. |
| 6 | Wang X B, Zhou H L, Zhang X X, et al. Analysis of the quality formation and influencing factors of apple fruit [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015,(13):186-189. |
| 7 | 李娅楠, 闫雷玉, 张波, 等. 不同苹果品种果实糖酸组分特征研究[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(11): 1877-1889. |
| 7 | Li Y N, Yan L Y, Zhang B, et al. A study on sugar and organic acid components in different apple cultivars [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(11): 1877-1889. |
| 8 | 冯娟, 任小林, 田建文, 等. 不同产地富士苹果品质分析与比较[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(14): 108-112. |
| 8 | Feng J, Ren X L, Tian J W, et al. Analysis and comparison of Fuji apple quality from different regions [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(14): 108-112. |
| 9 | 王爱玲,田时敏,梁哲军,等.我国苹果育种的研究现状及展望[J].中国果菜,2020,40,(12):60-62+84. |
| 9 | Wang A L, Tian S M, Liang Z J, et al. Research Status and Prospect of Apple Breeding in China[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2020,40,(12):60-62+84. |
| 10 | 董志丹,宋尚伟,宋春晖,等.我国育成苹果品种的系谱分析及其育种启示[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(21): 4485-4496. |
| 10 | Dong Z D, Song S W, Song C H, et al. Pedigree Analysis and Breeding Inspiration of Apple Cultivars in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(21): 4485-4496. |
| 11 | 聂继云. 果品质量安全分析技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2009. |
| 11 | Nie J Y. Technology of fruit quality and safety analysis[M].. Beijing. Chemical Industry Press Co.,Ltd, 2009. |
| 12 | 李育农. 苹果属植物种质资源研究[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2001. |
| 12 | Li Y N. Researches of germplasm resources of Malus Mill. Beijing: China Agriculture Ture Press,2001. |
| 13 | 白沙沙, 毕金峰, 王沛, 等. 不同品种苹果果实品质分析[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(17):68-72. |
| 13 | Bai S S, Bi J F, Wang P, et al. Fruit Quality Analysis of Different Apple Varieties[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(17):68-72. |
| 14 | 卢华琼, 苏智先. 部分柚类品种主要果实性状变异及相关性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006,(12): 220-222. |
| 14 | Lu H Q, Su Z X. Variation and Correlation Research of Main Fruit Characters of Pumelo Cultivars[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006,(12): 220-222. |
| 15 | 李芳红, 张晓煜, 陈仁伟, 等. 宁夏各产地‘红嘎啦’苹果品质分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(04): 23-28. |
| 15 | Li F H, Zhang X Y, Chen R W, et al. Quality Analysis of 'Red Gala' Apples from Different Production Areas of Ningxia[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(04): 23-28. |
| 16 | 贾定贤, 米文广, 杨儒琳, 等. 苹果品种果实糖、酸含量的分级标准与风味的关系[J]. 北方园艺. 1991,18(1): 9- 14. |
| 16 | Jing D X, Mi W G, Yang R L, et al. The relationship between grading standards and flavor of apple variety fruit sugar,acid content[J]. Northern Horticulture, 1991,18(1): 9- 14. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |