Ecological Security Assessment of Selenge River Basin in Mongolia Based on PSR Model

Expand
  • 1. School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222005, China
    2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China

Received date: 2023-03-03

  Online published: 2023-05-16

Abstract

The Selenge River in Mongolia is the world's largest freshwater lake—Lake Baikal, the most important inlet river, and the ecological security of the basin is a matter of concern for the construction of the ecological barrier on the Mongolian Plateau and in northern China. In order to clarify the ecological safety status of the Selenge River basin, this paper proposes an assessment method and technical process based on the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model, with a view to providing a reference for sustainable ecological management in the region through assessment applications. Firstly, we classify the land cover of Selenge River Basin and analyze the ecological status of Selenge River Basin with the official statistics of Mongolia. Further, based on the PSR model, a hierarchical analysis was used to assess the ecological safety status of the Selenge River basin. The results show that the real steppe within the Selenge River basin occupies the largest area of about 160,000 km2, accounting for 53% of the total area, followed by the forest with an area of about 10 km2, accounting for 32% of the total area, with a high vegetation cover. The ecological response and ecological state in the watershed are at a safer level, where the arable land area and the level of agricultural mechanization have a greater impact on the ecological state and ecological response. However, at the same time, there is a greater ecological pressure, and the area of land degradation and the stock of livestock are the main influencing factors that cause greater ecological pressure. In the future, policy regulation in these two aspects should be strengthened. In general, the ecological safety of the Selenge River Basin in Mongolia is at a relatively safe level and can be exploited moderately.

Cite this article

Zhou Jialing, Wang Juanle . Ecological Security Assessment of Selenge River Basin in Mongolia Based on PSR Model[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2023 , 5(1) : 87 -94 . DOI: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.230117

References

[1] 应凌霄, 孔令桥, 肖燚, 等. 生态安全及其评价方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(05): 1679-1692.
[1] Ying L X, Kong L Q, Xiao Y, et al. The research progress and prospect of ecological security and its assessing approaches[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(5): 1679-1692.
[2] R Chalov S, Jarsj? J, Kasimov N S, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of sediment transport in the Selenga River Basin, Mongolia and Russia[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73: 663-680.
[3] 肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002(3): 354-358.
[3] Xiao D N, Chen W B, Guo F L. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002(3): 354-358.
[4] Rogers K S. Ecological security and multinational corporations[J]. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 1997, 3: 29-36.
[5] Gari S R, Newton A, Icely J D. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2015, 103: 63-77.
[6] 刘慧丽, 查东平, 冯明雷, 等. 基于PSFR模型的江西省东江流域生态安全评估研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2021, 42(7): 25-33.
[6] Liu H L, Zha D P, Feng M L, et al. Study on ecological security assessment of Dongjiang River Basin in Jiangxi Provice based on PSFR model[J]. Pearl River, 2021, 42(7): 25-33.
[7] 魏伟, 雷莉, 周俊菊, 等. 基于GIS和PSR模型的石羊河流域生态安全评估[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(4): 789-795.
[7] Wei W, Lei L, Zhou J J, et al. Evaluation of the ecological security in Shiyang River Basin based on Grid GIS and PSR model[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(4): 789-795.
[8] Mosaffaie J, Jam A S, Tabatabaei M R, et al. Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 100: 104911.
[9] 魏竞超, 李自涵, 董媛媛. 基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型的黄河流域环境安全评价体系法治化研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2023, 39(1): 19-28.
[9] Wei J C, Li Z H, Dong Y Y. Legalization of environmental safety assessment system in the Yellow River Basin based on Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2023, 39(1): 19-28.
[10] Liu J, Cao X, Zhao L, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation of land ecological security and its influencing factors: A case study in Jinan, Shandong Province, China[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022: 8.
[11] Zhang Y, Zang P, Guo H, et al. Wetlands ecological security assessment in lower reaches of Taoerhe river connected with Nenjiang river using modified PSR model[J]. HydroResearch, 2023, 6: 156-165.
[12] 王燕辉, 陈卓, 曹禺, 等. 河北省近20年耕地生态安全动态变化及阻力分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(1): 194-199+206.
[12] Wang Y H, Chen Z, Cao Y, et al. Analysis on the dynamic change and resistance of cultivated land ecological security in the past 20 years in Hebei Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(1): 194-199+206.
[13] Dalantai S, Sumiya E, Bao Y, et al. Spatial-temporal changes of land degradation caused by natural and human induced factors: Case study of Bulgan Province in central Mongolia[J]. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 2021.DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-79-2021
[14] 徐浩冉. 福清市土地利用变化与土地生态安全评价研究[D]. 江苏海洋大学, 2022.
[14] Xu H R. Study on Land Use Change and Land Ecological Security in Fuqing City[D]. Jiangsu Ocean University, 2022.
[15] 王雪. 基于DPSIR模型的黄河流域榆中段生态安全评估研究[D]. 兰州大学, 2021.
[15] Wang X. Research on Ecological Security Assessment of the Yellow River Basin in the Yuzhong Region Based on DPSIR Model[D]. Lanzhou University, 2021.
[16] 何晔宇, 匡耀求. 基于驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应模型的粤港澳大湾区惠州海岸带生态安全评价分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2020, 42(3): 362-368.
[16] He Y Y, Kuang Y Q. Evaluation and analysis of ecological security of coastal zone in Huizhou of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on DPSIR model[J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2020, 42(3): 362-368.
[17] Bahraminejad M, Rayegani B, Nezami B, et al. Presenting an early warning system to supply the protected areas with ecological security (Case study: Darmiyan Protected Area, East of Iran)[J]. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 2018, 7(2): 75-94.
[18] Deshmukh M, Nanaware D, Kumbhar A. Performance of Western Maharashtra in Sustainable Livelihood Security Index[J]. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 2021, 9(1): 1-9.
Outlines

/