Journal of Agricultural Big Data >
Correlation Between Biomass of Hulunbuir Enclosed Grassland and Natural Grassland and Its Impact on Grassland Ecological Compensation Mechanism
Received date: 2023-05-19
Online published: 2023-08-15
The Hulunbuir Leymus chinensis Meadow Grassland is a grassland formation at the eastern end of the Central Asian Grassland Subregion in the Eurasian Grassland Region. It is one of the representative types of meadow grasslands, and its grassland ecosystem is undergoing dual pressures from human interference such as grazing and climate change, resulting in varying degrees of degradation. Based on the correlation between grazing disturbance intensity and grassland biomass, this paper selected the natural Leymus chinensis meadow inside and outside the fence in Hulunbeier area to carry out long-term observation on the composition of plant community in the field (enclosed in 2005), obtained the composition data of plant community in the meadow grassland (2009-2015), and studied the response of community coverage, community abundance, and community height to grazing intensity on this basis. Research has shown that enclosure significantly increases the aboveground biomass of grasslands, and the degree of improvement is positively correlated with the duration of enclosure; Meanwhile, moderate grazing interference will not cause a decrease in the abundance of grassland communities. Among them, the latter conclusion has enlightening significance for the grassland ecological compensation mechanism currently aimed at balancing grassland ecological protection and productivity improvement. Proper enclosure and grazing prohibition in severely degraded areas can help protect and build grasslands, partially reflecting the necessity of ecological compensation. At the same time, further analysis also indicates that there is still room for exploration in optimizing relevant policies. This study helps to deepen the understanding of grazing response and feedback mechanisms in grassland ecosystems, and can provide scientific basis for the protection and sustainable utilization of grassland ecosystems.
Key words： Hulun Buir; enclosed grassland; natural grassland; community biomass
YUAN Bo, YAN YiDan, CUO MeJi, NIE YingYing, XU LiJun . Correlation Between Biomass of Hulunbuir Enclosed Grassland and Natural Grassland and Its Impact on Grassland Ecological Compensation Mechanism[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2023 , 5(2) : 36 -43 . DOI: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.230206
| [1] | Kang L, Han X, Zhang Z, et al. Grassland ecosystems in China: Review of current knowledge and research advancement[J]. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 362(1482): 997-1008. |
| [2] | Sch?nbach P, Wan H, Gierus M, et al. Grassland responses to grazing: effects of grazing intensity and management system in an Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystem[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011, 340: 103-115. |
| [3] | Lei D, Sweeney S, Shangguan Z. Long-term effects of natural enclosure: carbon stocks,sequestration rates and potential for grassland ecosystems in the loess plateau[J]. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water, 2014, 42(5): 617-625. |
| [4] | Wang K. Grazing exclusion significantly improves grassland ecosystem C and N pools in a desert steppe of Northwest China[J]. CATENA, 2016, 137:441-448. |
| [5] | Mcnaughton S J. Compensatory plant-growth as a response to herbivory[J]. Oikos, 1983, 40(3):329-336. |
| [6] | 田野. 不同改良措施对羊草草甸草原割草地群落特征的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. |
| [6] | Tian Y. Effects of differernt improvement measures on mowing pasture communityin leymus chinensis meadow steppe[D]. Huhehot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese) |
| [7] | 辛晓平. 呼伦贝尔草原植物图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. |
| [7] | Xin X P. HilunBuir Grassland Plant In Colour[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. (in Chinese) |
| [8] | Xu L J, Nie Y Y, Chen B R, et al. Effects of fence enclosure on vegetation community characteristics and productivity of a degraded temperate meadow steppe in Northern China[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(8): 2952. |
| [9] | 陈宝瑞, 朱立博, 李刚, 等. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原不同放牧强度下植被特征分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2010, 31(4):67-71. |
| [9] | Chen B R, Zhu L B, Li G, et al. Analysis of vegetation characteristics under different grazing intensities in hulunber meadow steppe[J]. Chinese Joumal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2010, 31(4):67-71. (in Chinese) |
| [10] | 闫瑞瑞, 陈宝瑞, 张保辉, 等. 呼伦贝尔羊草草甸草原植物群落特征数据集(2009-2015)[J]. 农业大数据学报, 2021, 3(2):75-78. |
| [10] | Yan R R, Chen B R, Zhang B H, et al. Dynamic dataset of plant community characteristics of Leymus chinensis meadow steppe in HulunBuir, China (2009-2015)[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2021, 3(2):75-78. (in Chinese) |
| [11] | 杨桂霞, 唐华俊, 辛晓平, 等. 呼伦贝尔数据集(2006-2008)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008. |
| [11] | Yang G X, Tang H J, Xin X P, et al. Hulun Buir Dataset(2006-2008)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2008. (in Chinese) |
| [12] | 闫瑞瑞. 羊草草地植物群落特征(FZZ01)[DB/OL]. 国家生态科学数据中心.http://rs.cern.ac.cn/index.jsp. |
| [12] | Yan R R. Characteristics of plant community in Leymus chinensis grassland(FZZ01)[DB/OL]. National Ecosyst em Science Data Center. http://rs.cern.ac.cn/index.jsp. |
| [13] | 闫瑞瑞, 陈宝瑞, 张保辉, 等. 2009-2015年呼伦贝尔贝加尔针茅草甸草原植物群落组成动态数据集[J]. 中国科学数据, 2021, 6(3): 182-187. |
| [13] | Yan R R, Chen B R, Zhang B H, et al. A dynamic dataset of plant community composition in Hulun Buir Stipa Baicalensis meadow steppe (2009-2015)[J]. China Scientific Data, 2021, 6(3):182-187. (in Chinese) |
| [14] | 李永宏. 蒙古高原典型草原植物群落的生物多样性特征及其放牧动态规律[J]. 植物学通报, 1993(S1):23-24. |
| [14] | Li Y H. Biodiversity characteristics of the typical steppe on Mongolian Plateau and their changes under grazing influence[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1993(S1): 23-24. (in Chinese) |
| [15] | 李金花, 李镇清, 任继周. 放牧对草原植物的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2002(1): 4-11. |
| [15] | Li J H, Li Z Q, Re J Z. The effects of grazing on grassland plants[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2002(1):4-11. (in Chinese) |
| [16] | 靳三玲, 刁兆岩, 吕世海, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原植物功能群对围封及放牧的响应特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(1):151-158. |
| [16] | Jin S L, Diao Z Y, Lv S H, et al. Response characteristics of plant functional groups to enclosure and grazing in Hulunbuir grassland[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(1): 151-158. (in Chinese) |
| [17] | 赵登亮, 刘钟龄, 杨桂霞, 等. 放牧对克氏针茅草原植物群落与种群格局的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3):6-13. |
| [17] | Zhao D L, Liu Z L, Yang G X, et al. Grazing impact on distribution pattern of the plant communities and populations in Stipa kry lovii steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(3): 6-13. (in Chinese) |
| [18] | 桂建华, 马腾飞, 胡姝娅, 等. 长期围封对羊草和大针茅典型草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(5):720-727. |
| [18] | Gui J H, Ma T F, Hu Z Y, et al. Effects of long-term fencing on plant community characteristics of Leymus chinensis and Stipa grandis typical steppes[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(5): 720-727. (in Chinese) |
| [19] | 那音太, 秦福莹. 放牧制度对草原植被群落的影响[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2020. |
| [19] | Na Y T, Qin F Y. The impact of grazing system on grassland vegetation communities[M]. Beijing: Economy&Management Publishing House, 2020. (in Chinese) |
| [20] | 李香真, 牛海山, 孙铁军, 等. 地耳和地衣的化学元素组成特点及其与放牧率的关系[J]. 草地学报, 1999(3):251-256. |
| [20] | Li X Z, Niu H S, Sun T J, et al. Element composition of Nostoc commune and Xanthoparmelia camtschadalis under grazing pasture and their relations with stocking rates[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1999(3): 251-256. (in Chinese) |
| [21] | 王国杰. 放牧对内蒙古草原群落和土壤种子库的影响及两者关系的研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2005. |
| [21] | Wang G J. Effect of grazing on the plant communities and the soil seed banks and their relationship in Inner Mongolia steppe[D]. Beijing: Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005. (in Chinese) |
| [22] | 王梦佳, 孙睿, 刘喆, 等. 基于遥感数据的呼伦贝尔草原放牧强度研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(6):28-36. |
| [22] | Wang M J, Sun R, Liu Z, et al. A study of grazing intensity in the Hulunbuir grasslands using remote sensing[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(6):28-36. (in Chinese) |
| [23] | Milchunas D G, Vandever M W. Grazing effects on plant community succession of early‐ and mid‐seral seeded grassland compared to shortgrass steppe[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2014, 25(1): 22-35. |
| [24] | Bai H, Li W, Koike K. A new prenylated flavone from the leaves of Glycyrrhiza uralensis cultivated in China[J]. Heterocycles, 2004, 63(9): 2091-2095. |
| [25] | 孙世贤, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 等. 放牧强度季节调控下荒漠草原植物群落与功能群特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(10):2703-2710. |
| [25] | Sun S X, Wei Z J, Lu S J, et al. Characteristics of plant community and its functional groups in desert grassland under effects of seasonal regulation of grazing intensity[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(10):2703-2710. (in Chinese) |
| [26] | 杨思维. 高寒草甸植物群落与土壤对短期放牧的响应研究[D]. 兰州; 甘肃农业大学, 2017. |
| [26] | Yang S W. Studies on the effects of short-term grazing on plant community and soil of alpine meadow[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese) |
| [27] | 次旺欧珠. 草原生态补偿法治实践综述[J]. 现代农业研究, 2023, 29(4):119-121. |
| [27] | Ci W O Z. Summary of the legal practice of grassland ecological compensation[J]. Modern Agriculture Research, 2023, 29(4): 119-121. (in Chinese) |
| [28] | 杨莉. 生态保护红线区草原生态补偿机制重构研究:以锡林郭勒为例[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022. |
| [28] | Yang L. Study on reconstruction of grassland ecological compensation mechanism in ecological conservation redline area:the case of XilinGol[D]. Huhehot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022. (in Chinese) |
| [29] | 陆新元, 汪冬青. 关于我国生态环境补偿收费政策的构想[J]. 环境科学研究, 1994, 7(1):61-64. |
| [29] | Lu X Y, Wang D Q. Conception of China's ecological environment compensation and charging policy[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 1994, 7(1):61-64. (in Chinese) |
| [30] | 范明明. 草原生态补偿的跨尺度影响研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2020. |
| [30] | Fan M M. A Study on the cross scale impact of grassland ecological compensation[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2020. |
| [31] | 王关区. 我国草原退化加剧的深层次原因探析[J]. 内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2006, 27(4):1-6. |
| [31] | Wang G Q. A Probe into the deep seated causes of grassland degradation in China[J]. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 2006, 27(4): 1-6. (in Chinese) |
| [32] | 耿韶磊. 农业部全国草原监测报告[J]. 中国牧业通讯, 2007(9):28-33. |
| [32] | Geng S L. National grassland monitoring report of the Ministry of Agriculture[J]. China Animal Husbandry Bulletin, 2007(9):28-33. (in Chinese) |
| [33] | 尹剑慧, 卢欣石. 草原生态服务价值核算体系构建研究[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(2):174-180. |
| [33] | Yin J H, Lu X S. Calculation system construction of grassland ecological service value[J]. Acta Agrest-Ia Sinica, 2009, 17(2):174-180. (in Chinese) |
| [34] | 达林太, 郑易生. 牧区与市场:牧民经济学[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2010. |
| [34] | Da L T, Zheng Y S. Pastoral areas and markets: Pastoral economics[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 2010. (in Chinese) |
| [35] | 董孝斌, 张新时. 内蒙古草原不堪重负,生产方式亟须变革[J]. 资源科学, 2005(4):175-179. |
| [35] | Dong X B, Zhang X S. The grassland in the Inner Mongolia is overloaded and changes of the production pattern are highlighted[J]. Resources Science, 2005(4):175-179. (in Chinese) |
| [36] | 李金花, 潘浩文, 王刚. 内蒙古典型草原退化原因的初探[J]. 草业科学, 2004, 21(5):49-51. |
| [36] | Li J H, Pan H W, Wang G. Degradation causes of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(5):49-51. (in Chinese) |
| [37] | Roopnarine P. Ecology and the tragedy of the commons[J]. Sustainability, 2013, 5(2): 749-773. |
| [38] | 王宗礼. 牧草与粮食安全[C]. 2008年中国农业资源与区划学会学术年会论文集. 2008:385-390. |
| [38] | Wang Z L. Forage and Food Security[C]. Proceedings of the Academic Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Resources and Zoning in 2008, 2008:385-390. (in Chinese) |
| [39] | 韩锦涛, 韩黄英, 李素清. 山西省生态地理区划[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2008, 29(1):17-21. |
| [39] | Han J T, Han H Y, Li S Q. Regional planning for ecological and geographic regions of Shanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2008, 29(1):17-21. (in Chinese) |
| [40] | 张金屯. 山西高原草地退化及其防治对策[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2):49-52. |
| [40] | Zhang J T. Study on grassland degradation and its control strategies in Shanxi Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(2): 49-52. (in Chinese) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
