A Panoramic Guide to Multi-Omics Data Resources for Soybean

  • CAO YongRong ,
  • REN SiWei ,
  • XIE HaiXia ,
  • SHAO ZhouQin ,
  • TIAN DongMei ,
  • SONG ShuHui
Expand
  • 1 National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China
    2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Governance and Application of Biological Big Data, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China
    3 Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    4 Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    5 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

#These authors contributed equally to this work

*Corresponding authors.

Received date: 2026-01-07

  Accepted date: 2026-03-18

  Online published: 2026-04-01

Abstract

With the rapid development of sequencing technologies and high-throughput phenotyping approaches, soybean research has entered an era of rapid accumulation of multi-omics data. These data encompass multiple dimensions, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and phenomics, and have driven the establishment of a series of specialized databases such as SoyBase, SoyOD, SoyMD, and SoyOmics. Together, these resources provide a solid data foundation for functional gene discovery and molecular breeding applications. In this review, we systematically summarize currently available soybean multi-omics data resources and database platforms, highlighting their data types, organizational frameworks, and functional characteristics. We further analyze the complementarity among these platforms and review recent advances in the integrative application of multi-omics data. This review aims to provide researchers with a systematic, clear, and practical guide to soybean data resources, facilitating the efficient integration and utilization of diverse omics datasets and supporting precision breeding and in-depth studies of the genetic mechanisms underlying complex traits.

Cite this article

CAO YongRong , REN SiWei , XIE HaiXia , SHAO ZhouQin , TIAN DongMei , SONG ShuHui . A Panoramic Guide to Multi-Omics Data Resources for Soybean[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2026 , 8(1) : 98 -112 . DOI: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.000151

References

[1] XIE M, CHUNG C Y, LI M W, et al. A reference-grade wild soybean genome. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1216.
[2] VALLIYODAN B, CANNON S B, BAYER P E, et al. Construction and comparison of three reference-quality genome assemblies for soybean. Plant Journal, 2019, 100(5): 1066-82.
[3] SONG Q, JENKINS J, JIA G, et al. Construction of high resolution genetic linkage maps to improve the soybean genome sequence assembly Glyma1.01. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17(1): 33.
[4] SHEN Y, DU H, LIU Y, et al. Update soybean Zhonghuang 13 genome to a golden reference. Science China Life Sciences, 2019, 62(9): 1257-60.
[5] LIU Y, DU H, LI P, et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell, 2020, 182(1): 162-76.e13.
[6] BAYER P E, VALLIYODAN B, HU H, et al. Sequencing the USDA core soybean collection reveals gene loss during domestication and breeding. Plant Genome, 2022, 15(1): e20109.
[7] ZHANG J, SONG Q, CREGAN P B, et al. Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycine max). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2016, 129(1): 117-30.
[8] MORRELL P L, BUCKLER E S, ROSS-IBARRA J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2011, 13(2): 85-96.
[9] STEWART-BROWN B B, SONG Q, VAUGHN J N, et al. Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program. G3 (Bethesda), 2019, 9(7): 2253-65.
[10] ZHAO X, ZHU H, LIU F, et al. Integrating Genome-Wide Association Study, Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveal Novel QTL and Candidate Genes That Control Protein Content in Soybean. Plants (Basel), 2024, 13(8).
[11] PU Y, YAN R, JIA D, et al. Identification of soybean mosaic virus strain SC7 resistance loci and candidate genes in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2024, 299(1): 54.
[12] LI Y, GU J, ZHAO B, et al. Identification and confirmation of novel genetic loci and domestication gene GmGA20ox1 regulating primary root length in soybean seedling stage. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 217: 118814.
[13] FAN J, SHEN Y, CHEN C, et al. A large-scale integrated transcriptomic atlas for soybean organ development. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(4): 669-89.
[14] ALMEIDA-SILVA F, PEDROSA-SILVA F, VENANCIO T M. The Soybean Expression Atlas v2: A comprehensive database of over 5000 RNA-seq samples. Plant Journal, 2023, 116(4): 1041-51.
[15] LIU Z, KONG X, LONG Y, et al. Integrated single-nucleus and spatial transcriptomics captures transitional states in soybean nodule maturation. Nature Plants, 2023, 9(4): 515-24.
[16] DU J, WANG S, HE C, et al. Identification of regulatory networks and hub genes controlling soybean seed set and size using RNA sequencing analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(8): 1955-72.
[17] NIU J, ZHAO J, GUO Q, et al. WGCNA Reveals Hub Genes and Key Gene Regulatory Pathways of the Response of Soybean to Infection by Soybean mosaic virus. Genes (Basel), 2024, 15(5).
[18] CAO P, ZHAO Y, WU F, et al. Multi-Omics Techniques for Soybean Molecular Breeding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(9).
[19] GROSSKINSK D K, SYAIFULLAH S J, ROITSCH T. Integration of multi-omics techniques and physiological phenotyping within a holistic phenomics approach to study senescence in model and crop plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2018, 69(4): 825-44.
[20] XU X P, LIU H, TIAN L, et al. Integrated and comparative proteomics of high-oil and high-protein soybean seeds. Food Chemistry, 2015, 172: 105-16.
[21] AFROZ A, HASHIGUCHI A, KHAN M R, et al. Analyses of the proteomes of the leaf, hypocotyl, and root of young soybean seedlings. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2010, 17(3): 319-31.
[22] WANG X, KOMATSU S. Proteomic approaches to uncover the flooding and drought stress response mechanisms in soybean. Journal of Proteomics, 2018, 172: 201-15.
[23] WANG X, KHODADADI E, FAKHERI B, et al. Organ-specific proteomics of soybean seedlings under flooding and drought stresses. Journal of Proteomics, 2017, 162: 62-72.
[24] WEI J, LIU X, LI L, et al. Quantitative proteomic, physiological and biochemical analysis of cotyledon, embryo, leaf and pod reveals the effects of high temperature and humidity stress on seed vigor formation in soybean. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1): 127.
[25] LEE J, HWANG Y S, CHANG W S, et al. Seed maturity differentially mediates metabolic responses in black soybean. Food Chemistry, 2013, 141(3): 2052-9.
[26] DUBAL í T P, CORADI P C, DOS SANTOS BILHALVA N, et al. Monitoring of carbon dioxide and equilibrium moisture content for early detection of physicochemical and morphological changes in soybeans stored in vertical silos. Food Chemistry, 2024, 436: 137721.
[27] FENG Z, DING C, LI W, et al. Applications of metabolomics in the research of soybean plant under abiotic stress. Food Chemistry, 2020, 310: 125914.
[28] AN Y C, GOETTEL W, HAN Q, et al. Dynamic Changes of Genome- Wide DNA Methylation during Soybean Seed Development. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 12263.
[29] ZHAI H, WAN Z, JIAO S, et al. GmMDE genes bridge the maturity gene E1 and florigens in photoperiodic regulation of flowering in soybean. Plant Physiollogy, 2022, 189(2): 1021-36.
[30] RAMBANI A, HU Y, PIYA S, et al. Identification of Differentially Methylated miRNA Genes During Compatible and Incompatible Interactions Between Soybean and Soybean Cyst Nematode. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2020, 33(11): 1340-52.
[31] ZHANG Y, HAN X, SU D, et al. An analysis of differentially expressed and differentially m6A-modified transcripts in soybean roots treated with lead. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 453: 131370.
[32] HAN X, SHI Q, HE Z, et al. Transcriptome-wide N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) methylation in soybean under Meloidogyne incognita infection. aBIOTECH, 2022, 3(3): 197-211.
[33] HAN X, WANG J, ZHANG Y, et al. Changes in the m6A RNA methylome accompany the promotion of soybean root growth by rhizobia under cadmium stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 441: 129843.
[34] LU L, WEI W, TAO J J, et al. Nuclear factor Y subunit GmNFYA competes with GmHDA13 for interaction with GmFVE to positively regulate salt tolerance in soybean. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(11): 2362-79.
[35] LIU M, JIANG J, HAN Y, et al. Functional Characterization of the Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylases Family in Soybean. Plants (Basel), 2022, 11(11).
[36] SHEN Y, ZHOU G, LIANG C, et al. Omics-based interdisciplinarity is accelerating plant breeding. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2022, 66: 102167.
[37] YU N, LI L, SCHMITZ N, et al. Development of methods to improve soybean yield estimation and predict plant maturity with an unmanned aerial vehicle based platform. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 187: 91-101.
[38] TETILA E C, MACHADO B B, MENEZES G K, et al. Automatic Recognition of Soybean Leaf Diseases Using UAV Images and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(5): 903-7.
[39] MORRISON M, GAHAGAN A, LEFEBVRE M. Measuring canopy height in soybean and wheat using a low‐cost depth camera. The Plant Phenome Journal, 2021, 4.
[40] LI X, WANG C Y. From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing. International Journal of Oral Science, 2021, 13(1): 36.
[41] FAROOQ M A, GAO S, HASSAN M A, et al. Artificial intelligence in plant breeding. Trends in Genetics, 2024, 40(10): 891-908.
[42] LIU J, LI J, WANG H, et al. Application of deep learning in genomics. Science China Life Sciences, 2020, 63(12): 1860-78.
[43] Deep learning for genomics. Nature Genetics, 2019, 51(1): 1.
[44] ZHANG X, LUO Z, MARAND A P, et al. A spatially resolved multi-omic single-cell atlas of soybean development. Cell, 2025, 188(2): 550-67 e19.
[45] LIU Y, ZHANG Y, LIU X, et al.SoyOmics: A deeply integrated database on soybean multi-omics. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(5): 794-7.
[46] ZHANG Y, ZOU D, ZHU T, et al. Gene Expression Nebulas (GEN): a comprehensive data portal integrating transcriptomic profiles across multiple species at both bulk and single-cell levels. Nucleic Acids Research, 2022, 50(D1): D1016-D24.
[47] YANG Z, LUO C, PEI X, et al. SoyMD: a platform combining multi-omics data with various tools for soybean research and breeding. Nucleic Acids Research, 2024, 52(D1): D1639-D50.
[48] BROWN A V, CONNERS S I, HUANG W, et al. A new decade and new data at SoyBase, the USDA-ARS soybean genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(D1): D1496-D501.
[49] LI J, NI Q, HE G, et al. SoyOD: An Integrated Soybean Multi-omics Database for Mining Genes and Biological Research. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 2024, 22(6): qzae080.
[50] SU L, XU C, ZENG S, et al. Large-Scale Integrative Analysis of Soybean Transcriptome Using an Unsupervised Autoencoder Model. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 831204.
[51] PEREIRA J L, OLIMPIO G V, COELHO F S, et al. H+-ATPases Regulated by Auxin and ABA Mediate Acid Growth of Soybean Embryonic Axis During Germination. Seeds, 2025, 4(3).
[52] ZHANG Z-Q, LI M-M, TIAN R-M, et al. Genome-Wide Identification, Expression Profile and Evolution Analysis of Importin α Gene Family in Glycine max. Agronomy, 2025, 15(11).
[53] ARAUJO P M, GRUBER A, OLIVEIRA L S, et al. RdDM-Associated Chromatin Remodelers in Soybean: Evolution and Stress-Induced Expression of CLASSY Genes. Plants (Basel), 2025, 14(16).
[54] ARAUS J L, CAIRNS J E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci, 2014, 19(1): 52-61.
[55] COOPER M, TECHNOW F, MESSINA C, et al. Use of crop growth models with whole‐genome prediction: application to a maize multienvironment trial. Crop Science, 2016, 56(5): 2141-56.
[56] ZHAO C, ZHANG Y, DU J, et al. Crop phenomics: current status and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 714.
[57] CAO Y, TIAN D, TANG Z, et al. OPIA: an open archive of plant images and related phenotypic traits. Nucleic Acids Research, 2024, 52(D1): D1530-D7.
[58] ZHENG T, LI Y, LI Y, et al. SoyFGB v2. 0: a unique access to variations of Chinese Soybean Gene Bank (CNSGB) germplasm. bioRxiv, 2021: 2021.12. 28.474253.
[59] TIAN D, WANG P, TANG B, et al. GWAS Atlas: a curated resource of genome-wide variant-trait associations in plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Research, 2020, 48(D1): D927-D32.
[60] LIU X, TIAN D, LI C, et al. GWAS Atlas: an updated knowledgebase integrating more curated associations in plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Research, 2023, 51(D1): D969-D76.
[61] GRANT D, NELSON R T, CANNON S B, et al. SoyBase, the USDA-ARS soybean genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, 38(suppl_1): D843-D6.
[62] GAO P, ZHAO H, LUO Z, et al. SoyDNGP: a web-accessible deep learning framework for genomic prediction in soybean breeding. Brief Bioinform, 2023, 24(6).
[63] LIU Y, WANG D, HE F, et al. Phenotype Prediction and Genome- Wide Association Study Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network of Soybean. Frontiers in Genetics, 2019, 10: 1091.
[64] RANDELOVIC P, DORDEVIC V, MILADINOVIC J, et al. High-throughput phenotyping for non-destructive estimation of soybean fresh biomass using a machine learning model and temporal UAV data. Plant Methods, 2023, 19(1): 89.
[65] CHANG F, LV W, LV P, et al. Exploring genetic architecture for pod-related traits in soybean using image-based phenotyping. Molecular Breeding, 2021, 41(4): 28.
[66] YU T, ZHANG H, CHEN S, et al. EXGEP: a framework for predicting genotype-by-environment interactions using ensembles of explainable machine-learning models. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025, 26(4).
[67] YAO Z, YAO M, WANG C, et al. GEFormer: A genotype- environment interaction-based genomic prediction method that integrates the gating multilayer perceptron and linear attention mechanisms. Molcular Plant, 2025, 18(3): 527-49.
[68] YANG Q, HOU Z Y, LI L, et al. Landscape and m(6)A post- transcriptional regulation of soybean proteome. Cell Genomomics, 2025: 100926.
[69] ZHANG M, LIU S, WANG Z, et al. Progress in soybean functional genomics over the past decade. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2022, 20(2): 256-82.
[70] KHAN M N, KOMATSU S. Proteomic analysis of soybean root including hypocotyl during recovery from drought stress. Journal of Proteomics, 2016, 144: 39-50.
[71] KHATOON A, REHMAN S, HIRAGA S, et al. Organ-specific proteomics analysis for identification of response mechanism in soybean seedlings under flooding stress. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75(18): 5706-23.
[72] KOMATSU S, KOBAYASHI Y, NISHIZAWA K, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in soybean cell wall during flooding stress. Amino Acids, 2010, 39(5): 1435-49.
[73] AGRAWAL G K, HAJDUCH M, GRAHAM K, et al. In-depth investigation of the soybean seed-filling proteome and comparison with a parallel study of rapeseed. Plant Physiology, 2008, 148(1): 504-18.
[74] ARAI Y, HAYASHI M, NISHIMURA M. Proteomic analysis of highly purified peroxisomes from etiolated soybean cotyledons. Plant Cell Physiology, 2008, 49(4): 526-39.
[75] HAJDUCH M, GANAPATHY A, STEIN J W, et al. A systematic proteomic study of seed filling in soybean. Establishment of high- resolution two-dimensional reference maps, expression profiles, and an interactive proteome database. Plant Physiology, 2005, 137(4): 1397-419.
[76] TAVAKOLAN M, ALKHAROUF N W, KHAN F H, et al. SoyProDB: A database for the identification of soybean seed proteins. Bioinformation, 2013, 9(3): 165-7.
[77] TAVAKOLAN M, ALKHAROUF N W, MATTHEWS B F, et al.SoyProLow: A protein database enriched in low abundant soybean proteins. Bioinformation, 2014, 10(9): 599-601.
[78] KOMATSU S, WANG X, YIN X, et al. Integration of gel-based and gel-free proteomic data for functional analysis of proteins through Soybean Proteome Database. Journal of Proteomics, 2017, 163: 52-66.
[79] DEUTSCH E W, BANDEIRA N, PEREZ-RIVEROL Y, et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 2023, 51(D1): D1539-d48.
[80] MIN C W, GUPTA R, AGRAWAL G K, et al. Concepts and strategies of soybean seed proteomics using the shotgun proteomics approach. Expert Review of Proteomics, 2019, 16(9): 795-804.
[81] KOMATSU S, AHSAN N. Soybean proteomics and its application to functional analysis. Journal of proteomics, 2009, 72(3): 325-36.
[82] HOSSAIN Z, KOMATSU S. Soybean proteomics. Plant Proteomics: Methods and Protocols, 2013: 315-31.
[83] GLAUSER G, BOCCARD J, WOLFENDER J L, et al. Metabolomics: application in plant sciences. Metabolomics in practice: Successful strategies to generate and analyze metabolic data, 2013: 313-43.
[84] HU Y, LUAN T, WANG X, et al. Integrated Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analyses Reveal Resistance to Salt Stress in Wild Soybean (Glycine soja) During the Post‐Germination Growth Period. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2024, 210(5): e12748.
[85] SHEN Y, ZHANG J, LIU Y, et al. DNA methylation footprints during soybean domestication and improvement. Genome biology, 2018, 19(1): 128.
[86] SCHMUTZ J, CANNON S B, SCHLUETER J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature, 2010, 463(7278): 178-83.
[87] JOSHI T, YAO Q, LEVI D F, et al. SoyMetDB: The soybean metabolome database; proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), F 18-21 Dec. 2010, 2010[C].
[88] ZHOU Z, JIANG Y, WANG Z, et al. Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nature biotechnology, 2015, 33(4): 408-14.
[89] KIM E, HWANG S, LEE I. SoyNet: a database of co-functional networks for soybean Glycine max. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(D1): D1082-D9.
[90] CAO Y, LUO H, YE R, et al. Img2Variety:Image-Based Intraspecific Varieties Identification Across the Whole Growth Period. Plant Phenomics, 2025: 100151.
[91] NELSON R. Lessons from a soybean collection. Crop Science, 2023, 63(3): 1050-8.
[92] YU X, FU X, YANG Q, et al. Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of Soybean Landraces Collected from the Zhejiang Province in China. Plants, 2024, 13(3): 353.
[93] 王耀君, 徐国威, 朱建军, 等. 农业领域大语言模型研究进展. 农业机械学报, 56(9): 240-56.
  WANG Y, XU G, ZHU J, et al. Survey of Research on Large Language Models in Agriculture. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2025, 56(9):240-256.
[94] LV B, WU H, CHEN W, et al. VEG-MMKG: Multimodal knowledge graph construction for vegetables based on pre-trained model extraction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, 226.
[95] YANG F, KONG H, YING J, et al. SeedLLM.Rice: A large language model integrated with rice biological knowledge graph. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(7): 1118-29.
[96] CHAO D, WANG H, WAN F, et al. MtCro: multi-task deep learning framework improves multi-trait genomic prediction of crops. Plant Methods, 2025, 21(1): 12.
[97] 袁欢, 范蓓蕾, 杨晨雪, 等. 图神经网络应用于知识图谱构建:研究进展、农业发展潜力及关键方向. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(2): 41-56.
  YUAN H, FAN B L, YANG C X, et al. Graph neural networks for knowledge graph construction: research progress, agricultural development potential, and future directions. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(2): 41-56.
[98] 盐碱地上耐盐大豆新品系“中黄357”迎来丰收. 农村新技术, 2025 (11): 49-50.
  A new salt-tolerant soybean variety, “Zhonghuang 357,” has achieved a bumper harvest on saline-alkali land. Rural New Technology, 2025, (11): 49-50.
[99] ZHU Z, WANG Y, LIU S, et al. Genomic atlas of 8,105 accessions reveals stepwise domestication, global dissemination, and improvement trajectories in soybean. Cell, 2025, 188(23): 6519-35. e15.
Outlines

/