农业大数据学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1): 84-92.doi: 10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.200111

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

三大国家级农业科学院2011-2019年度国家自然科学基金项目立项分析

方蕾1(), 李希娟2, 赵艳3   

  1. 1. 中国热带农业科学院农产品加工研究所,湛江 524001
    2. 中国热带农业科学院科技处,海口 571101
    3. 中国林科院亚热带林业研究所,杭州 311400
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-13 出版日期:2020-03-26 发布日期:2020-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 方蕾 E-mail:fanglei789-2002@163.com
  • 作者简介:方蕾,女,研究生,研究方向:科研管理、成果转化; E-mail:fanglei789-2002@163.com

Analysis of the Project Approval of NSFC from Three Academies of Agricultural Sciences under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas from 20112019

Lei Fang1(), Xijuan Li2, Yan Zhao3   

  1. 1. Institute of Agriculture Products Processing Research, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture Sciences, Zhanjiang, 524001, China
    2. Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
    3. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China
  • Received:2019-10-13 Online:2020-03-26 Published:2020-06-02
  • Contact: Lei Fang E-mail:fanglei789-2002@163.com

摘要: 目的

为分析我国农业基础研究领域“十二五”以来科研实力和科研现状,揭示我国农业基础研究领域的努力方向。

方法

利用LetPut平台,对我国三大国家级农业科学院——中国农业科学院(简称“农科院”)、中国水产科学研究院(简称“水科院”)、中国热带农业科学院(简称“热科院”)2011-2019年的国家自然科学基金立项项目总数、不同类型项目立项数、不同年度和不同学部的立项情况进行统计分析,并对立项数最多的生命科学学部一级学科、二级学科的立项情况进行了深入研究。

结果

结果表明,农科院在国家自然科学基金的获取能力上明显强于水科院和热科院,学科发展更偏向于综合;水科院和热科院在农业科研领域学科发展特色鲜明,但水科院严重依赖于水产学科的发展,但水产学产前、产中、产后均有涉及,形成较完备产业链;热科院的研究则主要集中在热带植物方向。三大国家级农科院近年来青年基金项目均下降明显。

结论

“十二五”以来,三大国家级农业科学院在农业基础研究领域方面都取得了较快发展,从研究方向上来看,农科院更具综合性,水科院和热科院特色更鲜明。三大农科院应进一步聚焦世界农业科技前沿,加强青年人才培养,担负起中国农业科技创新火车头的重任。

关键词: 国家自然科学基金, 部属三院, 立项分析

Abstract: Objective

To analyze the scientific research strength and present situation of China's agricultural basic research, and reveal the direction of China's agricultural basic research since the 12th Five-Year Plan.

Method

Using the Letput platform, this paper presents a statistical analysis of the total number of NSFC projects, the number of different types of projects, and the projects of different years and different departments of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CAFS), and Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CATAS) from 2011–2019. In addition, project approval in the first-level and second-level disciplines of the life sciences departments with the largest number of projects has been studied in depth.

Results

The ability of CAAS to obtain NSFC support is significantly stronger than that of CATAS or CAFS, and the development of disciplines is more comprehensive; CATAS and CAFS have distinct characteristics in the field of agricultural scientific research; CAFS is heavily dependent on the development of aquaculture, and aquaculture is involved before, during, and after production, forming a relatively complete industrial chain; CATAS focuses on tropical plants. In recent years, the number of youth fund projects of the three academies of science has declined significantly.

Conclusion

Since the 12th Five-Year Plan, the three academies of agricultural sciences have developed rapidly in the field of agricultural basic research. In terms of research direction, CAAS is more comprehensive, and the characteristics of CAFS and CATAS are more distinct. The three academies of agricultural sciences should focus on remain at the cutting edge of world agricultural science and technology, strengthen the cultivation of young talent, and shoulder the important tasks of China's agricultural science and technology innovation.

Key words: NSFC, three Academy of Agricultural Sciences under the Ministry, project analysis

中图分类号: 

  • S-3