不同葡萄砧木贮藏营养及矿质营养比较

doi:10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.220313

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective This study analyzed different grapevine rootstocks storage and mineral nutrition content in juvenile branch and aimed to provide data for selection and usage of rootstocks. Method Nineteen grapevine rootstocks were collected by fruit research institute, Chinese academy of agricultural sciences and soluble sugar (SS), starch, free amino acid (FAA), soluble protein (SP), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg) content were measured and analyzed in juvenile branch and clustering analysis was used to study similarity of different cultivars. Result SS was the main component of storage nutrient in all rootstocks ranging from 44 to 93mg/g, and the difference was significant between treatments. FAA content was fluctuated from 0.8 to 3.5mg/g, meanwhile, SP content had little change. K and P content were significant higher than N and Mg content in branch. K and Mg contents had significant difference between different cultivars, however, the amplitude of variation of nitrogen and P content were smaller. nineteen grapevine rootstocks were subjected cluster analysis and divided to seven class groups, in which 140R was self-contained and SS and starch content was equal, as well as, FAA content was highest but N and P were lower; the class group consisting of 101-14, 420A, and kangzhen No 1 had higher SS, SP, and N content; 34EM, 225Ru, 5BB and 1103P had higher absorption efficiency of K, Mg and P. Conclusion SS was the main component of storage nutrient in grape branch, and K content was highest in mineral nutrient. The storage and mineral nutrient had significant difference among rootstocks, and different features showed from rootstock maybe provide basis for rootstock usage.

Key words: grapevine rootstocks, storage nutrient, mineral nutrient, cluster analysis

CLC Number:

S663

Yican Zhang, Fengzhi Liu, Haibo Wang. Comparison of Different Grapevine Rootstocks on Storage and Mineral Nutrition[J].Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(3): 77-83.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Variety, parent and character of rootstock in experiment"

亲本	砧木品种	特点
冬葡萄×河岸葡萄（V. berlandier×V. riparia）	5C	半矮化砧木，具有深根性，对土壤适应性广，早熟、丰产，品质、着色极好，抗寒性强
	5BB	根系极浅，易繁殖，幼树易徒长，品质、着色极好，抗寒性强、高抗线虫
	420A	半矮化砧木，生长势弱，早熟，品质、着色极好，小脚现象轻，抗旱，耐盐碱性强，耐寒性极强
	SO4	半矮化砧木，具有半深根性，土壤适应性广，生长快，早熟，丰产、品质优良，抗旱性强，抗根瘤蚜、抗线虫、抗寒
河岸葡萄×沙地葡萄（V. riparia× V. rupestris）	3309C	枝条不旺长，小脚现象较轻，晚熟、丰产，品质、着色良好，抗旱性强
	101-14	具有矮生性，生长势较弱，根系浅，小脚程度轻，早熟，品质、着色好，高抗线虫
冬葡萄×沙地葡萄（V. berlandier×V. rupestris）	225Ru	抗旱性强，耐盐性强、耐涝性强，抗根瘤蚜，抗线虫
	1103P	生长旺盛，生根和嫁接状况良好，产枝量中等，极抗旱，耐盐性强、高抗线虫，耐涝性强
	110R	生长旺盛，不易生根，在贫瘠土壤上果实品质优良，可延迟果实成熟，抗旱，抗根瘤蚜，抗石灰性土壤
	140R	生长势强，抗根瘤蚜，抗线虫，极抗旱，耐盐、耐寒
河岸葡萄×SO4 （V. riparia×V. berlandieri）	抗砧1号	生长势强，隐芽萌发力强，提早进入丰产期，高耐盐碱性，高抗根结线虫
	抗砧3号	根系发达，生长势旺盛，丰产稳产，耐盐碱，高抗葡萄根瘤蚜和根结线虫，
美洲葡萄×河岸葡萄（V. Labrusca×V. riparia）	贝达	生长势极强，小脚现象，适应性强，抗病性强，抗寒性强
贝达×420A （V. berlandieri-V. riparia ×V. labrusca cv.）	抗砧5号	生长势强，易生根，丰产稳产，适应性广，极耐盐碱，高抗根瘤蚜和根结线虫，抗病性极强
	抗砧6号	易感染根瘤蚜，抗白粉病
野生葡萄	沙地	乔化性砧木，树体强健，丰产，晚熟，抗旱性强
沙地葡萄（V. rupestris）	Lot	乔化砧，根系深，生长势极强，晚熟，品质差，着色差，抗根结线虫，抗根瘤蚜，抗真菌病害
左山一×白马拉加（V. amurensis×V. vinifera）	426	生长势强，早果性好，极丰产，抗寒性强，抗旱性及抗高温能力强，抗霜霉病
-----	34EM	抗寒性强，耐涝性强

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

References 38

1	Baumgartner K, Rizzo D M. Relative Resistance of Grapevine Rootstocks to Armillaria Root Disease [J]. Americal Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2006, 57(4): 408-414.
2	Sohrabi S, Ebadi A, Jalali S, et al. Enhanced Values of Various Physiological Traits and Vvnac1 Gene Expression Showing Better Salinity Stress Tolerance in Some Grapevine Cultivars as Well as Rootstocks [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 225(18): 317-326.
3	Somkuwar R G, Taware P B, Bhange M A, et al. Influence of Different Rootstocks on Growth, Photosynthesis, Biochemical Composition, and Nutrient Contents in 'Fantasy Seedless' Grapes [J]. International Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 15(3):251-266.
4	Jogaiah S, Sharma A K, Adsule P G. Rootstock Influence on the Biochemical Composition and Polyphenol Oxidase Activity of 'Thompson Seedless' Grapes and Raisins [J]. International Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 14(2):133-146.
5	Titova L A, Magomadoy A S， Avdeenko I A, et al. Analysis of the Development of Grafted Grape Seedlings on a Nursery Garden of Different Graft Rootstock Combinations [C]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 723.
6	Tecchio M A, Da Silva M J R, Callili D, et al. Yield of White and Red Grapes, in Terms of Quality, from Hybrids and Vitis Labrusca Grafted on Different Rootstocks [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 259(3):108846.
7	Da Silva M J R, Paiva A P M, Junior A P, et al. Yield Performance of New Juice Grape Varieties Grafted onto Different Rootstocks under Tropical Conditions [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 241(18):194-200.
8	郑晓翠, 王海波, 王孝娣, 等. 14个葡萄砧木品种抗寒性评价[J]. 中国果树, 2014, (1): 36-39.
	Zheng X C, Wang H B, Wang X D, et al. Evaluation of Cold Tolerance about Fourteen Grape Rootstocks [J]. China Fruit, 2014, (1): 36-39.
9	郑秋玲, 张超杰, 刘万好, 等. 不同砧木对‘赤霞珠’葡萄生长及贮藏营养的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(6): 102-104.
	Deng Q L, Zhang C J, Liu W H, et al. Effect of Different Rootstocks on 'Cabernet Sauvignon' Growth and Storage Nutrient [J]. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(6): 102-104.
10	韩真. 葡萄砧木钾吸收动力学及不同土壤类型供钾能力研究 [D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
	Han Z. K⁺ Uptake Kinetics of Grape Rootstock and Potassium Supplying Capability of Different Soils Types[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018.
11	Rual E H. Effect of Rootstocks and K⁺ Supply on pH and Acidity of Grape Juice [C]. Proceedings of the XXV International Horticultural Congress, 2000, 512: 31-37.
12	吴伟民, 王西成, 王庆莲, 等. 砧木对夏黑葡萄营养生长、果实品质及矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2014, (5): 14-17, 21.
	Wu W M, Wang X C, Wang Q L, et al. Effect of Different Rootstocks on Vegetative Growth, Fruit Quality and Mineral Element Contents of Summer Black Grapevine [J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2014, (5): 14-17, 21.
13	白世践, 户金鸽, 李超, 等. 葡萄砧木苗期对混合盐碱的生理响应及耐盐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59 (07): 1666-1679.
	Bai S J, Hu J G, Li C, et al. Physiological Response to Complex Saline-Alkali and its Tolerance Capacity Evaluation of Grape Rootstocks at Seedling Stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59 (07): 1666-1679.
14	谷元昌. 葡萄砧木及其主要品种的特性[J]. 北方果树, 1987, 01: 44-47.
	Gu Y C. The Characteristics of Grape Rootstock and its Main Varieties[J]. Northern Fruits, 1987, 01: 44-47.
15	刘崇怀. 葡萄砧木研究及利用概况[J]. 葡萄栽培与酿酒, 1992, 3: 20-24.
	Liu C H. The Study and Utilization of Grape Rootstocks[J]. Viticulture and Oenology, 1992, 3: 20-24.
16	樊秀彩. 葡萄砧木新品种“抗砧3号”[J]. 中国果业信息, 2011, 7: 56-57.
	Fan X C. A New Variety of Grape Rootstock - KangZhen No. 3[J]. China Fruit News, 2011, 7: 56-57.
17	樊彩秀, 郭景南, 孙海生, 等. 葡萄砧木新品种-抗砧5号的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 4: 735-736.
	Fan C X, Guo J N, Sun H S, et al. A New Grape Rootstock Cultivar Kangzhen No.5[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 4: 735-736.
18	孙海生, 陈绳良, 陈红军, 等. 抗砧系列葡萄砧木介绍[J]. 果农之友, 2013, 01: 8.
	Sun H S, Chen S L, Chen H J, et al. The Introduction of Kangzhen Serial Grape Rootstocks[J]. Fruit Growers' Friend, 2013, 01: 8.
19	董丹丹, 张化阁, 刘崇怀, 等. 抗砧系列砧木抗葡萄根瘤蚜特性鉴定[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(03): 193-197.
	Dong D D, Zhang H G, Liu C H, et al. Resistance Identification of Kangzhen Serial Grape Rootstocks to Grape Phylloxera[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(03): 193-197.
20	车顺风, 刘崇怀, 张国海, 等. 葡萄种质资源白粉病抗性调查[J]. 中国果树, 2021, 12: 89-92.
	Chen S F, Liu C H, Zhang G H, et al. Investigation on Resistance to Powdery Mildew of Grape Germplasm Resources[J]. China Fruits, 2021, 12: 89-92.
21	陈继峰. 国外抗旱葡萄砧木品种简介[J]. 中国果树, 2001, 06: 55.
	Chen J F. The Introduction of Drought Resistance Grape Rootstocks in Foreign[J]. China Fruits, 2001, 06: 55.
22	陈继峰, 刘三军, 孔庆山, 等. 葡萄砧木的抗逆性试验[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2000, 2:16-17.
	Chen J F, Liu S J, Kong Q S, et al. Study of Grape Rootstock Resistance to Unsuitable Conditions[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2000, 2: 16-17.
23	王海波, 修德仁, 王宝亮, 等. 酿酒与砧木兼用葡萄新品种-华葡1号[J].园艺学报, 2012, 39(11):2309-2311.
	Wang H B, Xiu D R, Wang B L, et al. A New Brewing And Stock Grape Culticar 'Huapu 1'[J]. Acta Horticluturae Sinica, 2012, 39(11):2309-2311.
24	小泽俊治, 方淑英, 严大义. 葡萄的砧木[J]. 葡萄栽培与酿酒, 1990, (Z1): 72-74.DOI:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.1990.z1.020 . doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.1990.z1.020
	Xiao Z J Y, Fang S Y, Yang D Y. Rootstock of Grape[J]. Viticulture and Oenology, 1990, (Z1): 72-74.DOI:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.1990.z1.020 . doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.1990.z1.020
25	刘崇怀, 孙海生, 李民. 葡萄抗性砧木的选择和利用[J], 果农之友, 2005.
	Liu C H, Sun H S, Li M. Choice and Utilization Of Resistance Grape Rootstock[J]. Fruit Growers' Friend, 2005.
26	陈继峰. 葡萄砧木品种的研究现状及展望[J], 果树科学, 2000, 17(2): 138-146.
	Chen J F. The Status of Research on Grape Rootstock Varieties and its Prospect[J], Journal of Fruit Science, 2000, 17(2): 138-146.
27	王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
	Wang X K. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010.
28	赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
	Zhao S J, Shi G A, Dong X C. Plant Physiology Experiment Instruction [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002.
29	王小龙, 邵学东, 张正文, 等. 梅乐葡萄叶片和果实矿质元素变化规律及相关性分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(S1): 155-164.
	Wang X L, Shao X D, Zhang Z W, et al. Variation Laws and Correlation Analysis of Mineral Elements in Leaves and Fruits of Merlot Grape [J]. Acta Agriculturse Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(S1): 155-164.
30	Lee J, and Steenwerth K L. Rootstock and Vineyard Floor Management Influence on 'Cabernet Sauvignon' Grape Yeast Assimilable Nitrogen(YAM) [J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 127: 926-933.
31	张行杰, 张禹, 刘万好, 等. 不同砧木对夏黑果实及树体贮藏营养的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45 (03): 135-137.
	Zhang X J, Zhang Y, Liu W H, et al. Effect of Different Rootstocks on Fruit and Tree Storage Nutrient of 'Summer Black' [J]. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(03): 135-137.
32	钟海霞, 潘明启, 张付春, 等. 不同砧木对克瑞森葡萄果实可溶性糖含量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(09): 1633-1638.
	Zhong H X, Pan M Q, Zhang F C, et al. Effect of Different Rootstocks on Soluble Sugar Content of Crimson Grape Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(09): 1633-1638.
33	Murthy S V K and lyengar E R V. Kinetic Parameters of Nitrogen Absorption in Varieties and Rootstocks of Grape (Vitis Vinifera) [J]. India Journal of Plant Physiology, 1997, 2: 232-233.
34	张新杰, 王记侠, 任玉华. 葡萄砧木特性及其对嫁接品种的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 31(06): 0517-6611.
	Zhang X J, Wang J X, Ren Y H. Characteristics of Grape Rootstock and Its Influence on Grafted Variety[J]. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Sciences, 2007, 31(06): 0517-6611.
35	Ramhari G, Somkuwar, Pravin B, et al. Influence of Different Rootstocks on Growth, Photosynthesis, Biochemical Composition, and Nutrient Contents in 'Fantasy Seedless' Grape[J]. International Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 15(3): 251-266.
36	袁军伟, 郭紫娟, 刘长江, 等.不同品种砧木嫁接对葡萄叶柄矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2015, 19(02): 29-32.
	Yuan J W, Guo Z J, Liu C J, et al. Effect of Different Rootstocks on Mineral Nutrition Contents of Petioles of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' [J]. Journal of Heibei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 19(02): 29-32.
37	马振强, 臧兴隆, 孙鲁龙, 等. 几种葡萄砧木及其与赤霞珠嫁接组合磷效率比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(07): 272.
	Ma Z Q, Zang X L, Sun L L, et al. Comparison of Phosphorus Efficiency on Different Rootstocks and Their Grafted Seedlings with Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(07): 272.
38	Kose B, Horuz A, Akinoglu G. Phenological Changes of Leaf Nutrients in Vitis Labrusca L. Grape Grafted on Different Rootstocks in Heavy Clay Soil Conditions[J]. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2016, 58: 211-217.

砧木品种	可溶性糖（mg/g）	淀粉（mg/g）	游离氨基酸（mg/g）	可溶性蛋白（mg/g）
5C	62.61±6.01	24.35±0.81	3.24±0.63	5.36±0.66
3309C	72.57±7.10	31.24±1.86	1.43±0.06	6.80±0.57
34EM	53.12±1.73	33.46±0.96	0.88±0.13	6.57±0.21
抗砧1号	86.53±2.41	29.60±1.87	3.01±0.24	6.94±0.39
225Ru	59.08±6.21	23.43±1.33	1.68±0.06	6.65±0.43
5BB	46.04±2.02	11.27±1.10	0.75±0.00	5.66±0.58
1103P	62.31±3.69	25.23±2.67	2.39±0.30	5.93±0.23
101-14	93.15±9.93	34.81±1.52	2.34±0.36	6.52±0.96
110R	52.82±3.74	28.09±1.57	2.36±0.22	5.52±0.26
Lot	55.25±5.54	33.72±1.65	1.22±0.09	5.31±0.27
抗砧3号	59.90±2.69	27.32±0.70	1.18±0.14	4.95±0.22
420A	77.42±6.69	25.09±2.01	1.95±0.10	6.41±0.61
SO4	71.32±7.47	42.84±3.91	1.39±0.13	5.26±0.20
沙地	63.06±1.94	34.06±3.45	2.26±0.26	6.15±0.51
抗砧5号	55.79±2.92	56.49±3.01	3.36±0.16	5.85±0.14
贝达	56.35±4.07	39.37±2.37	3.71±0.31	5.41±0.12
426	51.70±2.76	53.15±3.61	3.49±0.44	5.32±0.39
140R	44.72±4.85	41.98±3.56	6.01±0.84	6.30±0.27
抗砧6号	68.53±2.51	46.32±1.05	3.18±0.17	6.37±0.15

砧木品种	钾（mg/g）	镁（mg/g）	磷（mg/g）	氮（mg/g）
5C	6.00±0.15	1.34±0.16	4.67±0.08	3.12±0.05
3309C	3.92±0.17	1.13±0.15	3.96±0.43	2.64±0.29
34EM	5.55±0.60	2.04±0.19	4.14±0.38	2.76±0.25
抗砧1号	7.21±0.18	2.20±0.16	4.28±0.04	2.85±0.03
225Ru	8.00±0.27	2.13±0.02	4.45±0.47	2.97±0.31
5BB	7.66±0.01	1.60±0.16	3.70±0.21	2.46±0.14
1103P	6.31±0.12	1.91±0.19	4.20±0.70	2.80±0.47
101-14	5.40±0.02	1.95±0.18	4.65±0.32	3.10±0.21
110R	5.97±0.42	1.31±0.28	4.30±0.01	2.87±0.01
Lot	5.76±0.19	1.24±0.02	3.92±0.44	2.61±0.29
抗砧3号	5.87±0.24	1.21±0.14	4.22±0.25	2.81±0.16
420A	4.34±0.23	1.61±0.05	5.29±0.26	3.52±0.17
SO4	4.76±0.15	1.07±0.04	4.53±0.39	3.02±0.26
沙地	4.65±0.04	1.10±0.08	4.19±0.28	2.79±0.18
抗砧5号	4.55±0.25	1.50±0.09	4.01±0.06	2.67±0.04
贝达	3.79±0.26	1.26±0.19	4.19±0.15	2.79±0.10
426	4.64±0.26	1.22±0.13	4.20±0.35	2.80±0.23
140R	5.76±0.02	1.47±0.09	2.90±0.16	1.94±0.11
抗砧6号	3.76±0.12	1.06±0.01	3.50±0.13	2.34±0.09

Comparison of Different Grapevine Rootstocks on Storage and Mineral Nutrition

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 38

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0