GreenLab模型20余年研究回顾与展望

doi:10.19788/j.issn.2096-6369.210301

Abstract

Abstract:

The GreenLab model is an organ-level Functional-Structural Plant Model (FSPM), which simulates plant growth and development processes with the discrete dynamic system, including biomass production, partitioning, and structure formation. It is a generic FSPM that integrates multi-disciplinary knowledge from botany, mathematics, agronomy, computer science, and automation science. Sino-French cooperation around GreenLab since 1998 has led to the development of new methods, algorithms, and software. These include a dual-scale automaton, parameter inversion for plants with branching structure, stochastic FSPM with theoretical computation, plant fast modelling and visualization, a plant growth modelling and fitting tool in Scilab and Matlab, and a simulator for complex structure in c++. The GreenLab model has been applied on dozens of plants with their own features, including maize, wheat, cucumber, tomato, rapeseed, pine tree, and maple tree, covering plants ranging from herbaceous crops to complex trees. The model is characterized by the fact that its source-sink parameters affecting the biomass production and partitioning can be inversely estimated through the measured organ biomass and quantity. It is applicable for single stem or branching structures, deterministic or stochastic cases, with common organ-level target data for parameter identification and model calibration. This paper reviews the development history and recent advances of the GreenLab model and presents the basic concepts and key methods. These include dual-scale automaton, organ series, the generic plant fitting. It gives some details on the structural model (the computation on organ quantities and the stochastic simulation on organ production) and the functional model (demand of organ and plant, biomass production and allocation, and organ growth). With the availability of plant phenotype technologies, GreenLab can be used for building parallel agricultural system, supporting the deep understanding of the plant-environment interaction, and the intelligent decision support for management and control of production management.

Key words: GreenLab, Functional-Structural Model, discrete dynamic model, parameter calibration, agriculture parallel system

CLC Number:

TU205

Mengzhen Kang, Xiujuan Wang, Jing Hua. Over Two Decades of Research with Greenlab Model[J].Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2021, 3(3): 3-12.

Figures/Tables 4

References 33

1	Vos J, Evers J B, Buck-Sorlin G, et al. Functional–structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 61(8): 2101–2115.
2	Eschenbach C. Emergent properties modelled with the functional structural tree growth model ALMIS: Computer experiments on resource gain and use[J]. 2005,186(4): 470-488.
3	Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, et al. LIGNUM: A tree model based on simple structural units[J]. Annals of botany, 1996,77(1): 87-98.
4	Allen M T, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong T M. Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model[J]. New phytologist, 2005, 166(3): 869-880.
5	Pradal C, Dufour-Kowalski S, Boudon F, et al. OpenAlea: a visual programming and component-based software platform for plant modelling[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2008,35(9-10): 751-760.
6	Kniemeyer O, Kurth W. The modelling platform GroIMP and the programming language XL[C]//International Symposium on Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007: 570-572.
7	de Reffye P, Snoeck J, Walyaro D J, et al. Modele mathématique de base pour l'étude et la simulation de la croissance rt de l'architecture du Coffea robusta[J]. Cafe Cacao the, 1976, 20(1) : 11-32.
8	de Reffye P, Edelin C, Françon J, et al. Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development[J]. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, 1988, 22(4): 151-158.
9	Hallé F, Oldeman R A A, Tomlinson P B. Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis[M]. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.
10	de Reffye P, Fourcaud T, Laise F B, et al. A functional model of tree growth and tree architecture[J]. Silva Fennica, 1997,31(3).
11	de Reffye P, Hu B G, Kang M, et al. Two decades of research with the GreenLab model in Agronomy[J]. Annals of botany, 2020,3(127): 281-295.
12	Letort V, P-H Cournède, Mathieu A, et al. Parametric identification of a functional-structural tree growth model and application to beech trees (Fagus sylvatica), Functional Plant Biology, 2008, 35(9-10):951-963.
13	Kang M Z, de Reffye P, Heuvelink E. Modeling the growth of inflorescence[C]//2009 Third International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications. IEEE, 2009: 303-310.
14	Kang M Z, Heuvelink E, Carvalho S M P, et al. A virtual plant that responds to the environment like a real one: the case for chrysanthemum[J]. The New Phytologist, 2012,195(2): 384-395.
15	Jaeger M, de Reffye P. Basic concepts of computer simulation of plant growth[J]. Journal of Biosciences, 1992,17(3): 275-291.
16	赵星, de Reffye P., 熊范纶, 等. 虚拟植物生长的双尺度自动机模型[J]. 计算机学报, 2001,24(6): 608-615.
	Zhao X, de Reffye P., Xiong F L, et al. Dual-scale automaton model for virtual plant development[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2001, 24(6): 608-615.
17	Kang M Z, Hua J, Wang X J, et al. Estimating sink parameters of stochastic functional-structural plant models using organic series-continuous and rhythmic development.[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2018(9): 1688.
18	Hu B G, de Reffye P, Zhao X, et al. Greenlab: A new methodology towards plant functional-structural model--structural part[C]//Plant growth modelling and applications. TsingHua University Press and Springer, 2003: 21-35.
19	Kang M Z, Cournède P, de Reffye P, et al. Analytical study of a stochastic plant growth model: Application to the GreenLab model[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2008,78(1): 57-75.
20	Lindenmayer A. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development I. Filaments with one-sided inputs[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1968,18(3): 280-299.
21	Yan H, de Reffye P, Pan C, et al. Fast construction of plant architectural models based on substructure decomposition[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2003,18(6): 780-787.
22	Heuvelink E. TOMSIM: a dynamic simulation model for tomato crop growth and development[C]//ISHS Second Int. Symp. on Models for Plant Growth, Env. Control and Farm Management in Protected Cultivation, Wageningen, The Netherlands (1997). 1997.
23	Marcelis L F M, Heuvelink E, Goudriaan J. Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1998,74(1): 83-111.
24	Yan H P, Kang M Z, de Reffye P, et al. A dynamic, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth, Annals of Botany, 2004, 93(5):591-602.
25	Buis R, Barthou H. Relations dimensionnelles dans une série organique en croissance chez une plante supérieure[J]. Review Biomathematics, 1983,85: 1-19.
26	Véronique L, Sylvie S, Pamelas O M, et al. Internal trophic pressure, a regulator of plant development? Insights from a stochastic functional–structural plant growth model applied to Coffea trees[J]. Annals of Botany, 2020, 126(4): 687-699.
27	Yang W, Feng H, Feng X, et al. Crop phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: past decades, current challenges, and future perspectives[J]. Molecular Plant, 2020,13(2): 187-214.
28	Fan X R, Kang M Z, Heuvelink E, et al. A knowledge-and-data-driven modeling approach for simulating plant growth: A case study on tomato growth[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015,312: 363-373.
29	Kang M Z, Wang F -Y. From parallel plants to smart plants: intelligent control and management for plant growth[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2017, 4(2): 161-167.
30	Kang M Z, Fan X R, Hua J, et al. Managing traditional solar greenhouse with CPSS: A just-for-fit philosophy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2018,48(12): 3371-3380.
31	Sharathkumar M, Heuvelink E, Marcelis L F M. Vertical farming: moving from genetic to environmental modification[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2020,25(8): 724-727.
32	Fan X R, Wang X J, Kang M Z, et al. A knowledge-and-data-driven modeling approach for simulating plant growth and the dynamics of CO2/O2 concentrations in a closed system of plants and humans by integrating mechanistic and empirical models[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 148: 280-290.
33	Chenu K, Porter J R, Martre P, et al. Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2017,22(6): 472-490.

[1]	Qian Chen, Han Yang, Baogang Wang, Wensheng Li, Jianping Qian. Time Series Prediction of Cold-chain Transportation Temperature Based on GRU Neural Network Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 82-88.
[2]	Rongrong Zhou, Dong Chen, Siyuan Liu. Optimization Model of Vehicle Scheduling for Fresh Food Distribution Using the K-means Clustering Algorithm [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 89-97.
[3]	Miao He, Xin Li, Zhiqiang Zhu, Jianying Feng. Modeling Table Grapes: Physicochemical Indexes and Sensory Quality Based on PCA-GA-SVR during Transportation Process [J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2022, 4(1): 98-108.

Over Two Decades of Research with Greenlab Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 33

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0